I vote for #2. Archeologists can still dig it up through an svn
revision.
Erik
On Oct 7, 2009, at 12:24 AM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
I don't think solrjs should hold up the 1.4 release.
Since this issue was last discussed, James McKinney has licensed
AJAX Solr (a solrjs fork) under Apache & MIT
http://github.com/evolvingweb/AJAX-Solr/blob/master/COPYRIGHT.txt
It seems like this has good support and gets the on-going attention
it deserves.
I suggest we archive solrjs -- remove it from the 1.4 release -- and
point javascript client lovers to AJAX-Solr.
If we do "archive" solrjs, what do you think the best method is?
1. svn copy it to /sandbox?
2. make a zip and place it on an external site, remove it entirely
from solr svn
I lean towards option 1.
thoughts
ryan
