+1 on the Solr 1.4 voting process being parallel to that of Lucene 2.9.1. Bill
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com>wrote: > OK, so let's do the following: as soon as the Lucene 2.9.1 official RC > is put up (the one that will be voted on), I'll update Solr and we can > do our vote at the same time, saving 3 or 4 days... this release has > really been held up long enough :-) > > We can re-evaluate what to do if for some reason the Lucene vote > doesn't pass (i.e., we won't blindly release Solr if the lucene vote > fails). > > Hopefully everyone has looked at the latest Solr distributions for any > potential showstoppers that would cause them to vote -1 during the > official vote. > > -Yonik > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> > wrote: > > Please wait for an official release of Lucene. It makes thing SO much > easier > > when you need to dig into the Lucene code. > > > > It is well worth a week delay. > > > > wunder > > > > On Oct 19, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Are we ready for a release? > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> I don't think we need to wait for Lucene 2.9.1 - we have all the fixes > >> in our version, and there's little point in pushing things off yet > >> another week. > >> > >> Seems like the next RC should be a *real* one (i.e. no RC label in the > >> version, immediately call a VOTE). > >> > >> -Yonik > >> http://www.lucidimagination.com > >> > >>> I got busy at work and haven't been able to > >>> address things as much, but it seems like things are progressing. > >>> > >>> Shall I generate another RC or are we waiting for Lucene 2.9.1? If we > go > >>> w/ > >>> the 2.9.1-dev, then we just need to restore the Maven stuff for them. > >>> Hopefully, that stuff was just commented out and not completely > removed > >>> so > >>> as to make it a little easier to restore. > >>> > >>> -Grant > >> > > > > >
