So far so good on Resin 3.0.x (that's not the latest version of Resin). Bill
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Ryan McKinley <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've been testing with jetty 7.0.0.v20091005, and everything works good so > far.. > > > > On Oct 25, 2009, at 3:59 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > > If all goes well in lucene-land 2.9.1 should start a vote on Monday >> sometime... >> >> I've recently tested the latest stable Jetty (6.1.21) ... so we can >> avoid some duplication, has anyone tested with the latest tomcat, >> resin, or other popular servlet containers? >> >> -Yonik >> http://www.lucidimagination.com >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Yonik Seeley >> <yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: >> >>> OK, so let's do the following: as soon as the Lucene 2.9.1 official RC >>> is put up (the one that will be voted on), I'll update Solr and we can >>> do our vote at the same time, saving 3 or 4 days... this release has >>> really been held up long enough :-) >>> >>> We can re-evaluate what to do if for some reason the Lucene vote >>> doesn't pass (i.e., we won't blindly release Solr if the lucene vote >>> fails). >>> >>> Hopefully everyone has looked at the latest Solr distributions for any >>> potential showstoppers that would cause them to vote -1 during the >>> official vote. >>> >>> -Yonik >>> http://www.lucidimagination.com >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Please wait for an official release of Lucene. It makes thing SO much >>>> easier >>>> when you need to dig into the Lucene code. >>>> >>>> It is well worth a week delay. >>>> >>>> wunder >>>> >>>> On Oct 19, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org >>>>> > >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Are we ready for a release? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> I don't think we need to wait for Lucene 2.9.1 - we have all the fixes >>>>> in our version, and there's little point in pushing things off yet >>>>> another week. >>>>> >>>>> Seems like the next RC should be a *real* one (i.e. no RC label in the >>>>> version, immediately call a VOTE). >>>>> >>>>> -Yonik >>>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com >>>>> >>>>> I got busy at work and haven't been able to >>>>>> address things as much, but it seems like things are progressing. >>>>>> >>>>>> Shall I generate another RC or are we waiting for Lucene 2.9.1? If we >>>>>> go >>>>>> w/ >>>>>> the 2.9.1-dev, then we just need to restore the Maven stuff for them. >>>>>> Hopefully, that stuff was just commented out and not completely >>>>>> removed >>>>>> so >>>>>> as to make it a little easier to restore. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Grant >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >
