Since Solr is dependent on Lucene I agree that there should be a major version number bump in Solr whenever there is one in Lucene:
Solr 2.x with Lucene 3.x On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yonik Seeley wrote: > > What should the next version of Solr be? > > > > Options: > > - have a Solr 1.5 with a lucene 2.9.x > > - have a Solr 1.5 with a lucene 3.x, with weaker back compat given all > > of the removed lucene deprecations from 2.9->3.0 > > - have a Solr 2.0 with a lucene 3.x > > > > -Yonik > > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > > +1 for 2.0 with 3.x - not going to be easy keeping devs from taking > advantage of new Lucene features for another whole release period. And > 1.5 with 3.x doesn't make a lot of sense if its going to be weaker back > compat - 2.0 makes sense in that case. > > -- > - Mark > > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > > >
