Is that a proposal to never leave 1.x :) I guess numbers do allow it ...

Lance Norskog wrote:
> In practical terms, calling a release 2.0 means it will never finish.
> "One last feature! No, really!" happens with 1.x. A Solr 2.0 will be
> killed by "Let's rewrite this!"
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-system_effect
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote:
>   
>> On Nov 19, 2009, at 9:31 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> What should the next version of Solr be?
>>>
>>> Options:
>>>
>>> - have a Solr 2.0 with a lucene 3.x
>>>       
>> +1.  This gives us a chance to remove some deprecated stuff, too.
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>   

Reply via email to