[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12794306#action_12794306
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1298:
----------------------------------
Both Chris and me are trying to achieve more or less the same thing. just that
SOLR-1566 is a bit more ambitious in scope.
@Uri , I would request you to take a look at the patch in SOLR-1566 also .
I guess, all of us agree upon the fact that we need a generic way to add
non-Lucene fields to a SolrDocument . The fields could be
single-valued/multivalued . Say a function returns a List<int> should be valid
too.(I even say it could even be a NamedList) . This is useful for a lot of
usecases.
As long as we can achieve this functionality in a performant way, it is fine.
Let us converge our efforts and bring this to a resolution ASAP.
> FunctionQuery results as pseudo-fields
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1298
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1298
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.5
>
> Attachments: SOLR-1298-FieldValues.patch, SOLR-1298.patch
>
>
> It would be helpful if the results of FunctionQueries could be added as
> fields to a document.
> Couple of options here:
> 1. Run FunctionQuery as part of relevance score and add that piece to the
> document
> 2. Run the function (not really a query) during Document/Field retrieval
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
