[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12794069#action_12794069
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1298:
---------------------------------------
{quote}fl=foo is ambiguous... do we mean a function query or the field?...
perhaps if it's a bare field name, then we treat it as a field unless it has
localparams?
fl={!func}foo
{quote}
It is and isn't ambiguous, right? The result should be the same in that the
value for that field is loaded (although I suppose it has implications that it
would now be possible to load non-stored, single valued fields if we treat it
as a function). FWIW, for the sort by function case, I checked to see if it is
a field first, then a function, then puke.
> FunctionQuery results as pseudo-fields
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1298
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1298
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.5
>
> Attachments: SOLR-1298-FieldValues.patch, SOLR-1298.patch
>
>
> It would be helpful if the results of FunctionQueries could be added as
> fields to a document.
> Couple of options here:
> 1. Run FunctionQuery as part of relevance score and add that piece to the
> document
> 2. Run the function (not really a query) during Document/Field retrieval
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
