On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Norman Wiechmann <n.wiechm...@gmx.net> wrote: > Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote: >> >> if it is not provided with setters , what do you suggest? provide it >> with getters? > > yes, i would like to have the @Field annotation at getters. and if there is > no reason against this i can provide a patch for DocumentObjectBinder that > adds getter annotation and keeps the setter annotation for backward > compatibility.
I personally don't think it makes a lot of difference just because other JPA tools don't follow that pattern. So removing the annotation from the setter is not required > > best, Norman > -- ----------------------------------------------------- Noble Paul | Systems Architect| AOL | http://aol.com
