I'm reviewing SOLR-1817 and noticing that when CoreContainer parses
solr.xml, it asserts that at most one core has a "name" matching the
"defaultCoreName" ... but there is currently no assertion that every core
have a name, or that the names be unique before the SolrCore is
constructed ... it's not until the core is registered that an error will
be generated if the core name is null, or that the previous core with an
identicle name will be close()ed.
Is there any reason why CoreContainer shouldn't throw an exception if
solr.xml declares a core w/o a name, or two cores with the same name?
-Hoss
- multiple cores w/same name in solr.xml ??? Chris Hostetter
-