On 3/18/10 11:25 AM, "Yonik Seeley" <ysee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Chris Hostetter > <hossman_luc...@fucit.org> wrote: >> 3.1 may make life easy for us as developers, but is likely to be just as >> cofusing to users as if we called the next version "Q" > > We're jumping to version 3.1 because we're releasing at the same time, > and are based on Lucene 3.1. To me this is just another example of these artifacts really needing to be kept separate. To take the extreme case in this, then why not sync up release #s with other major dependencies as well? Solr supports a version of the Servlet spec right? Why not sync with that? One could argue that Solr is just as dependent on the HTTP layer as it is on the underlying search framework? I don't think that the release versions need to be in sync. Cheers, Chris ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
