Getting 10,000 records will be slow. What are you doing with 10,000 records?
wunder On 3/19/08 10:07 PM, "李银松" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want to get the top 10000-10010 record from two different servers,So Ihave > to get top10010 scores from each server and merge them to get the results. I > found the cost time was mostly used in XMLResponseParser while parsing > the inputstream. I wander whether the costtime was used for net transport or > for Solr to prepare for transport? Or just something wrong with my server? > 在08-3-20，Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 写道： > > 2008/3/19 李银松 > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > 1、When I set fl=score ,solr returns just as > fl=*,score ,not just scores > > Is it a bug or just do it on purpose? > > On > purpose... a score alone with no other context doesn't seem useful. > > > 2 > 、I'm using solrj to get about 10000 docs' score in LAN. It costs me > about > > > 10+ seconds first time(QTime is less than 100ms) , but 1-2 seconds > > second > > time with the same querystring. It seems a bit too long for the > first > > time(total size of the doc to transport is about 500k). Is there > > anything i > > can do with it? > > What are you trying to do with that many > scores? > Search engines are optimized more for retrieving the top n matches > > (where n is ~10 - 100) > > -Yonik >
