I am not getting 10000 records I am getting records from 10000-10010 So I need the top10010 records' *sort field* to merge and get final results,just like the distributed search the data to transport is about 500k(10000 docs' scores) and the QTime is about 100ms but the total time I used is about 10+ seconds I want to know it really cost so much time or something other is wrong .
2008/3/20, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Getting 10,000 records will be slow. > > What are you doing with 10,000 records? > > wunder > > On 3/19/08 10:07 PM, "李银松" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I want to get the top 10000-10010 record from two different servers,So > Ihave > > to get top10010 scores from each server and merge them to get > the results. > I > > found the cost time was mostly used in XMLResponseParser while parsing > > the > inputstream. > I wander whether the costtime was used for net transport or > > for Solr to > prepare for transport? Or just something wrong with my server? > > > > 在08-3-20，Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 写道： > > > > 2008/3/19 李银松 > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > 1、When I set fl=score ,solr returns just as > > fl=*,score ,not just scores > > > Is it a bug or just do it on purpose? > > > > On > > purpose... a score alone with no other context doesn't seem useful. > > > > > 2 > > 、I'm using solrj to get about 10000 docs' score in LAN. It costs me > > about > > > > > 10+ seconds first time(QTime is less than 100ms) , but 1-2 seconds > > > > second > > > time with the same querystring. It seems a bit too long for the > > first > > > time(total size of the doc to transport is about 500k). Is there > > > > anything i > > > can do with it? > > > > What are you trying to do with that many > > scores? > > Search engines are optimized more for retrieving the top n matches > > > > (where n is ~10 - 100) > > > > -Yonik > > > > >
