Hi Dmitry, Thank you for the detailed clarification!
Recently, I've created a few patches to Pivot version(LUCENE-2562), so I'd like to some more work and keep up to date it. > If you would like to work on the Pivot version, may I suggest you to fork > the github's version? The ultimate goal is to donate this to Apache, but at > least we will have the common plate. :) Yes, I love to the idea about having common code base. I've looked at both codes of github's (thinlet's) and Pivot's, Pivot's version has very different structure from github's (I think that is mainly for UI framework's requirement.) So it seems to be difficult to directly fork github's version to develop Pivot's version..., but I think I (or any other developers) could catch up changes in github's version. There's long way to go for Pivot's version, of course, I'd like to also make pull requests to enhance github's version if I can. Thanks, Tomoko 2015-02-24 23:34 GMT+09:00 Dmitry Kan <solrexp...@gmail.com>: > Hi, Tomoko! > > Thanks for being a fan of luke! > > Current status of github's luke (https://github.com/DmitryKey/luke) is > that > it has releases for all the major lucene versions since 4.3.0, excluding > 4.4.0 (luke 4.5.0 should be able open indices of 4.4.0) and the latest -- > 5.0.0. > > Porting the github's luke to ALv2 compliant framework (GWT or Pivot) is a > long standing goal. With GWT I had issues related to listing and reading > the index directory. So this effort has been parked. Most recently I have > been approaching the Pivot. Mark Miller has done an initial port, that I > took as the basis. I'm hoping to continue on this track as time permits. > > > If you would like to work on the Pivot version, may I suggest you to fork > the github's version? The ultimate goal is to donate this to Apache, but at > least we will have the common plate. :) > > > Thanks, > Dmitry > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Tomoko Uchida < > tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm an user / fan of Luke, so deeply appreciate your work. > > > > I've carefully read the readme, noticed the (one of) project's goal: > > "To port the thinlet UI to an ASL compliant license framework so that it > > can be contributed back to Apache Lucene. Current work is done with GWT > > 2.5.1." > > > > There has been GWT based, ASL compliant Luke supporting the latest > Lucene ? > > > > I've recently got in with LUCENE-2562. Currently, Apache Pivot based port > > is going. But I do not know so much about Luke's long (and may be > slightly > > complex) history, so I would grateful if anybody clear the association of > > the Luke project (now on Github) and the Jira issue. Or, they can be > > independent of each other. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2562 > > I don't have any opinions, just want to understand current status and > avoid > > duplicate works. > > > > Apologize for a bit annoying post. > > > > Many thanks, > > Tomoko > > > > > > > > 2015-02-24 0:00 GMT+09:00 Dmitry Kan <solrexp...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Luke 4.10.3 has been released. Download it here: > > > > > > https://github.com/DmitryKey/luke/releases/tag/luke-4.10.3 > > > > > > The release has been tested against the solr-4.10.3 based index. > > > > > > Issues fixed in this release: #13 > > > <https://github.com/DmitryKey/luke/pull/13> > > > Apache License 2.0 abbreviation changed from ASL 2.0 to ALv2 > > > > > > Thanks to respective contributors! > > > > > > > > > P.S. waiting for lucene 5.0 artifacts to hit public maven repositories > > for > > > the next major release of luke. > > > > > > -- > > > Dmitry Kan > > > Luke Toolbox: http://github.com/DmitryKey/luke > > > Blog: http://dmitrykan.blogspot.com > > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/dmitrykan > > > SemanticAnalyzer: www.semanticanalyzer.info > > > > > > > > > -- > Dmitry Kan > Luke Toolbox: http://github.com/DmitryKey/luke > Blog: http://dmitrykan.blogspot.com > Twitter: http://twitter.com/dmitrykan > SemanticAnalyzer: www.semanticanalyzer.info >
