Thank you so much for your advice.

Regards,
Edwin

On 4 June 2015 at 22:30, Alessandro Benedetti <benedetti.ale...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Please remember this :
>
> "to be used as the basis for a suggestion, the field must be stored"
>
> From the official guide.
>
> Cheers
>
> 2015-06-04 11:19 GMT+01:00 Alessandro Benedetti <
> benedetti.ale...@gmail.com>
> :
>
> > If you are using an existing indexed field to provide suggestions, you
> > simply need to build the suggester and start using it !
> > No re-indexing needed .
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > 2015-06-04 11:01 GMT+01:00 Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> I think I'm confused with the old spellcheck approach that came out more
> >> frequently during my research.
> >>
> >> Just to confirm, do I need to re-index the data in order for this new
> >> approach to work if I'm using an existing field?
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Edwin
> >>
> >>
> >> On 4 June 2015 at 16:58, Alessandro Benedetti <
> benedetti.ale...@gmail.com
> >> >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Let me try to clarify the things…
> >> > Because you are using solr 5.1 I can not see any reason to try to use
> >> the
> >> > old spellcheck approach.
> >> > If you take a look to the page me and Erick quoted there is a simple
> >> config
> >> > example :
> >> >
> >> > <searchComponent name="suggest" class="solr.SuggestComponent">
> >> > > <lst name="suggester">
> >> > > <str name="name">mySuggester</str>
> >> > > <str name="lookupImpl">FuzzyLookupFactory</str>
> >> > > <str name="storeDir">suggester_fuzzy_dir</str>
> >> > > <!-- Substitute these for the two above for another "flavor"
> >> > > <str name=”lookupImpl”>AnalyzingInfixLookupFactory</str>
> >> > > <str name=”indexPath”>suggester_infix_dir</str>
> >> > > -->
> >> > > <str name="dictionaryImpl">DocumentDictionaryFactory</str>
> >> > > <str name="field">title</str>
> >> > > <str name="suggestAnalyzerFieldType">suggestType</str>
> >> > > <str name="buildOnStartup">false</str>
> >> > > <str name="buildOnCommit">false</str>
> >> > > </lst>
> >> > > </searchComponent>
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > <requestHandler name="/suggesthandler" class="solr.SearchHandler"
> >> > > startup="lazy" >
> >> > > <lst name="defaults">
> >> > > <str name="suggest">true</str>
> >> > > <str name="suggest.count">10</str>
> >> > > <str name=”suggest.dictionary”>mySuggester</str>
> >> > > </lst>
> >> > > <arr name="components">
> >> > > <str>suggest</str>
> >> > > </arr>
> >> > > </requestHandler>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > You should use this approach.
> >> > After you build the Suggestion Dictionary ( after your first commit or
> >> > manually) you are going to be able to see the suggestions.
> >> >
> >> > Your config appears to be very confused ( why an edismax query parser
> >> for a
> >> > suggestion request handler ? )
> >> >
> >> > To answer do Dalnesh, there is no benefit in explicitly expressing
> again
> >> > the query parameters, they are already appended if you take a look to
> >> Edwin
> >> > config, so this will not solve anything.
> >> >
> >> > I would suggest you to use the latest approach and then verify the
> >> > suggester building went fine.
> >> >
> >> > Cheers
> >> >
> >> > 2015-06-04 9:13 GMT+01:00 Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com>:
> >> >
> >> > > This is the result that I get from the query URL you mentioned.
> Still
> >> not
> >> > > able to get any output.
> >> > >
> >> > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> >> > > <response>
> >> > >   <lst name="responseHeader">
> >> > >     <int name="status">0</int>
> >> > >     <int name="QTime">0</int>
> >> > >   <lst name="params">
> >> > >     <str name="suggest.build">true</str>
> >> > >     <str name="suggest.q">mater</str>
> >> > >     <str name="suggest">true</str>
> >> > >     <str name="suggest.dictionary">suggest</str>
> >> > >     <str name="wt">xml</str>
> >> > >   </lst>
> >> > > </lst>
> >> > > </response>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > > Edwin
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On 4 June 2015 at 15:26, Dhanesh Radhakrishnan <dhan...@hifx.co.in>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Try this
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/suggest?suggest=true&suggest.dictionary=suggest&suggest.build=true&wt=xml&suggest.q=mater
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <
> >> > > edwinye...@gmail.com
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > I've tried to use the solr.SuggestComponent as stated in the
> >> website,
> >> > > but
> >> > > > > it couldn't work.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > When I change to using the suggest with the configuration below
> >> and
> >> > go
> >> > > a
> >> > > > > query like
> http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/suggest?q=mater
> >> ,
> >> > it
> >> > > > says
> >> > > > > "The Webpage cannot be found"
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >   <searchComponent class="solr.SuggestComponent" name="suggest">
> >> > > > >     <lst name="spellchecker">
> >> > > > >       <str name="name">suggest</str>
> >> > > > >       <str
> >> > > > >
> name="classname">org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.Suggester</str>
> >> > > > >       <str
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> name="lookupImpl">org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.tst.TSTLookupFactory</str>
> >> > > > >   <str name="field">text</str>  <!-- the indexed field to derive
> >> > > > > suggestions from -->
> >> > > > >       <str name="buildOnCommit">true</str>
> >> > > > >     </lst>
> >> > > > >   </searchComponent>
> >> > > > >   <requestHandler
> >> > > class="org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler"
> >> > > > > name="/suggest">
> >> > > > >     <lst name="defaults">
> >> > > > >        <str name="echoParams">explicit</str>
> >> > > > >   <str name="defType">edismax</str>
> >> > > > >        <int name="rows">10</int>
> >> > > > >        <str name="wt">json</str>
> >> > > > >        <str name="indent">true</str>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >       <str name="suggest">true</str>
> >> > > > >       <str name="suggest.dictionary">suggest</str>
> >> > > > >       <str name="suggest.count">5</str>
> >> > > > >       <str name="suggest.collate">true</str>
> >> > > > >     </lst>
> >> > > > >     <arr name="components">
> >> > > > >       <str>suggest</str>
> >> > > > >     </arr>
> >> > > > >   </requestHandler>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Regards,
> >> > > > > Edwin
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On 4 June 2015 at 13:21, Erick Erickson <
> erickerick...@gmail.com>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > This may be helpful:
> http://lucidworks.com/blog/solr-suggester/
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Note that there are a series of fixes in various versions of
> >> Solr,
> >> > > > > > particularly buildOnStartup=false and working on multivalued
> >> > fields.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Best,
> >> > > > > > Erick
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
> >> > > > > > <edwinye...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > My previous suggester configuration is derived from this
> page:
> >> > > > > > > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/Suggester
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Does it mean that what is written there is outdated?
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Regards,
> >> > > > > > > Edwin
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > On 3 June 2015 at 23:44, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <
> >> > edwinye...@gmail.com
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> Thank you for your suggestions.
> >> > > > > > >> Will try that out and update on the results again.
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> Regards,
> >> > > > > > >> Edwin
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> On 3 June 2015 at 21:13, Alessandro Benedetti <
> >> > > > > > benedetti.ale...@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > > >> wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >>> I can see a lot of confusion in the configuration!
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>> Few suggestions :
> >> > > > > > >>> - read carefully the document and try to apply the
> >> suggesting
> >> > > > > guidance
> >> > > > > > >>> - currently there is no need to use spellcheck for
> >> suggestions,
> >> > > now
> >> > > > > > they
> >> > > > > > >>> are separated things
> >> > > > > > >>> - i see text used to derive suggestions, I would prefer
> >> there
> >> > to
> >> > > > see
> >> > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > >>> copy field specifically used to contain the interesting
> >> fields
> >> > > > > > >>> - Yes you need to build the suggester the first time to
> see
> >> > > > > suggestions
> >> > > > > > >>> - Yes , if you add a copy field yo need to re-index to see
> >> it
> >> > > > filled
> >> > > > > !
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>> Cheers
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>> 2015-06-03 11:07 GMT+01:00 Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <
> >> > > > edwinye...@gmail.com
> >> > > > > >:
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>> > This is my suggester configuration:
> >> > > > > > >>> >
> >> > > > > > >>> >   <searchComponent class="solr.SpellCheckComponent"
> >> > > > name="suggest">
> >> > > > > > >>> >     <lst name="spellchecker">
> >> > > > > > >>> >       <str name="name">suggest</str>
> >> > > > > > >>> >       <str
> >> > > > > > >>> >
> >> > > name="classname">org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.Suggester</str>
> >> > > > > > >>> >       <str
> >> > > > > > >>> >
> >> > > > > > >>> >
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> name="lookupImpl">org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.tst.TSTLookupFactory</str>
> >> > > > > > >>> >   <str name="field">text</str>  <!-- the indexed field
> to
> >> > > derive
> >> > > > > > >>> > suggestions from -->
> >> > > > > > >>> >       <float name="threshold">0.005</float>
> >> > > > > > >>> >       <str name="buildOnCommit">true</str>
> >> > > > > > >>> >     </lst>
> >> > > > > > >>> >   </searchComponent>
> >> > > > > > >>> >   <requestHandler
> >> > > > > > >>> class="org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler"
> >> > > > > > >>> > name="/suggest">
> >> > > > > > >>> >     <lst name="defaults">
> >> > > > > > >>> >        <str name="echoParams">explicit</str>
> >> > > > > > >>> >   <str name="defType">edismax</str>
> >> > > > > > >>> >        <int name="rows">10</int>
> >> > > > > > >>> >        <str name="wt">json</str>
> >> > > > > > >>> >        <str name="indent">true</str>
> >> > > > > > >>> >   <str name="df">text</str>
> >> > > > > > >>> >
> >> > > > > > >>> >       <str name="spellcheck">true</str>
> >> > > > > > >>> >       <str name="spellcheck.dictionary">suggest</str>
> >> > > > > > >>> >       <str name="spellcheck.onlyMorePopular">true</str>
> >> > > > > > >>> >       <str name="spellcheck.count">5</str>
> >> > > > > > >>> >       <str name="spellcheck.collate">true</str>
> >> > > > > > >>> >     </lst>
> >> > > > > > >>> >     <arr name="components">
> >> > > > > > >>> >       <str>suggest</str>
> >> > > > > > >>> >     </arr>
> >> > > > > > >>> >   </requestHandler>
> >> > > > > > >>> >
> >> > > > > > >>> >
> >> > > > > > >>> > Yes, I've read the guide. I've found out that there is a
> >> need
> >> > > to
> >> > > > do
> >> > > > > > >>> > re-indexing if I'm creating a new copyField. It works
> >> when I
> >> > > used
> >> > > > > the
> >> > > > > > >>> > copyField that's created before the indexing is done.
> >> > > > > > >>> >
> >> > > > > > >>> > As I'm using the spellcheck dictionary as my suggester,
> so
> >> > does
> >> > > > > that
> >> > > > > > >>> mean I
> >> > > > > > >>> > just need to build the spellcheck dictionary?
> >> > > > > > >>> >
> >> > > > > > >>> >
> >> > > > > > >>> > Regards,
> >> > > > > > >>> > Edwin
> >> > > > > > >>> >
> >> > > > > > >>> >
> >> > > > > > >>> > On 3 June 2015 at 17:36, Alessandro Benedetti <
> >> > > > > > >>> benedetti.ale...@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > > >>> > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>> >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > Can you share you suggester configurations ?
> >> > > > > > >>> > > Have you read the guide I linked ?
> >> > > > > > >>> > > Has the suggestion index/fst has been built ? ( you
> >> need to
> >> > > > build
> >> > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > >>> > > suggester)
> >> > > > > > >>> > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > Cheers
> >> > > > > > >>> > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > 2015-06-03 4:07 GMT+01:00 Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <
> >> > > > > > edwinye...@gmail.com>:
> >> > > > > > >>> > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > Thank you for your explanation.
> >> > > > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > I'll not need to care where the suggestions are
> coming
> >> > > from.
> >> > > > > All
> >> > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > suggestions from different fields can be consolidate
> >> and
> >> > > > > display
> >> > > > > > >>> > > together.
> >> > > > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > I've tried to put those field into a new Suggestion
> >> copy
> >> > > > field,
> >> > > > > > but
> >> > > > > > >>> no
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > suggestion is shown when I set:
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > <str name="field">Suggestion</str>  <!-- the indexed
> >> > field
> >> > > to
> >> > > > > > derive
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > suggestions from -->
> >> > > > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > Is there a need to re-index the documents in order
> for
> >> > this
> >> > > > to
> >> > > > > > work?
> >> > > > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > Regards,
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > Edwin
> >> > > > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > On 2 June 2015 at 17:25, Alessandro Benedetti <
> >> > > > > > >>> > > benedetti.ale...@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > Hi Edwin,
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > I have worked extensively recently in Suggester
> and
> >> the
> >> > > > blog
> >> > > > > I
> >> > > > > > >>> feel
> >> > > > > > >>> > to
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > suggest is Erick's one.
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > It's really detailed and good for a beginner and
> >> expert
> >> > > as
> >> > > > > > well.
> >> > > > > > >>> [1]
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > Apart that let's see you particular use case :
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > 1) Do you want to be able to get also where the
> >> > > suggestions
> >> > > > > are
> >> > > > > > >>> > coming
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > from
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > ?
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > e.g.
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > suggestion1 from field1
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > suggestion2 from field2 ?
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > In this case I would try with multiple
> dictionaries
> >> > but I
> >> > > > am
> >> > > > > > not
> >> > > > > > >>> sure
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > Solr
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > allows you to use them concurrently.
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > But can be a really nice extension to develop.
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > 2) If you don't care where the suggestions are
> >> coming
> >> > > from,
> >> > > > > > just
> >> > > > > > >>> use
> >> > > > > > >>> > a
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > copy
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > field, where you copy the content of the
> interesting
> >> > > > fields.
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > The suggestions will come from the fields you have
> >> > copied
> >> > > > in
> >> > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > >>> copy
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > field, without distinction.
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > Hope this helps you
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > Cheers
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > [1] http://lucidworks.com/blog/solr-suggester/
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > 2015-06-02 4:22 GMT+01:00 Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <
> >> > > > > > >>> edwinye...@gmail.com
> >> > > > > > >>> > >:
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Hi,
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Does anyone knows if we can derive suggestions
> >> across
> >> > > > > > multiple
> >> > > > > > >>> > > fields?
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > I tried to set something like this in my field
> in
> >> > > suggest
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > searchComponents
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > in solrconfig.xml, but nothing is returned. It
> >> only
> >> > > works
> >> > > > > > when I
> >> > > > > > >>> > set
> >> > > > > > >>> > > a
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > single field, and not multiple field.
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >   <searchComponent
> >> class="solr.SpellCheckComponent"
> >> > > > > > >>> name="suggest">
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >     <lst name="spellchecker">
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >       <str name="name">suggest</str>
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >       <str
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > name="classname">org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.Suggester</str>
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >       <str
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > >
> >> > > > > > >>> >
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> name="lookupImpl">org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.tst.TSTLookupFactory</str>
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >   <str name="field">Content, Summary</str>  <!--
> >> the
> >> > > > > indexed
> >> > > > > > >>> field
> >> > > > > > >>> > to
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > derive suggestions from -->
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >       <float name="threshold">0.005</float>
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >       <str name="buildOnCommit">true</str>
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >     </lst>
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >   </searchComponent>
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > I'm using solr 5.1.
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Regards,
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Edwin
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > --
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > --------------------------
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > Benedetti Alessandro
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > Visiting card :
> >> http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > "Tyger, tyger burning bright
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > In the forests of the night,
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > What immortal hand or eye
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > Could frame thy fearful symmetry?"
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > > William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England
> >> > > > > > >>> > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > --
> >> > > > > > >>> > > --------------------------
> >> > > > > > >>> > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > Benedetti Alessandro
> >> > > > > > >>> > > Visiting card : http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti
> >> > > > > > >>> > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > "Tyger, tyger burning bright
> >> > > > > > >>> > > In the forests of the night,
> >> > > > > > >>> > > What immortal hand or eye
> >> > > > > > >>> > > Could frame thy fearful symmetry?"
> >> > > > > > >>> > >
> >> > > > > > >>> > > William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England
> >> > > > > > >>> > >
> >> > > > > > >>> >
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>> --
> >> > > > > > >>> --------------------------
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>> Benedetti Alessandro
> >> > > > > > >>> Visiting card : http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>> "Tyger, tyger burning bright
> >> > > > > > >>> In the forests of the night,
> >> > > > > > >>> What immortal hand or eye
> >> > > > > > >>> Could frame thy fearful symmetry?"
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>> William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > >  [image: hifx_logo] <http://hifx.in/>
> >> > > > *dhanesh s.R *
> >> > > > Team Lead
> >> > > > t: (+91) 484 4011750 (ext. 712) | m: ​(+91) 99 4 6666 703
> >> > > > e: dhan...@hifx.in | w: www.hifx.in
> >> > > > <https://www.facebook.com/HiFXIT> <https://twitter.com/HiFXTweets
> >
> >> > > > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/2889649>
> >> > > > <https://plus.google.com/104259935226993895226/about>
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > >
> >> > > > ------------------------------
> >> > > > IMPORTANT: This is an e-mail from HiFX IT Media Services Pvt. Ltd.
> >> Its
> >> > > > content are confidential to the intended recipient. If you are not
> >> the
> >> > > > intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail
> in
> >> > > error
> >> > > > and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying
> of
> >> > this
> >> > > > e-mail is strictly prohibited. It may not be disclosed to or used
> by
> >> > > anyone
> >> > > > other than its intended recipient, nor may it be copied in any
> way.
> >> If
> >> > > > received in error, please email a reply to the sender, then delete
> >> it
> >> > > from
> >> > > > your system.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Although this e-mail has been scanned for viruses, HiFX cannot
> >> > ultimately
> >> > > > accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your
> responsibility
> >> to
> >> > > scan
> >> > > > attachments (if any).
> >> > > >
> >> > > > ​
> >> > > > Before you print this email or attachments, please consider the
> >> > negative
> >> > > > environmental impacts associated with printing.
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > --------------------------
> >> >
> >> > Benedetti Alessandro
> >> > Visiting card : http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti
> >> >
> >> > "Tyger, tyger burning bright
> >> > In the forests of the night,
> >> > What immortal hand or eye
> >> > Could frame thy fearful symmetry?"
> >> >
> >> > William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > --------------------------
> >
> > Benedetti Alessandro
> > Visiting card : http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti
> >
> > "Tyger, tyger burning bright
> > In the forests of the night,
> > What immortal hand or eye
> > Could frame thy fearful symmetry?"
> >
> > William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --------------------------
>
> Benedetti Alessandro
> Visiting card : http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti
>
> "Tyger, tyger burning bright
> In the forests of the night,
> What immortal hand or eye
> Could frame thy fearful symmetry?"
>
> William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England
>

Reply via email to