Not really. There's no need to use ngrams as the article suggests if the terms component does what you need. Which is why I asked you about what autocomplete means in your context. Which you have not clarified. Have you even looked at terms component? Especially the terms.prefix option?
Terms component has it's limitations, but performance isn't one of them. The suggesters mentioned in the article have other limitations. It's really useless to discuss those limitations, though, until the problem you're trying to solve is clearly stated. On Aug 1, 2015 1:01 PM, "Olivier Austina" <olivier.aust...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you Eric for your reply. > If I understand it seems that these approaches are using index to hold > terms. As the index grows bigger, it can be a performance issues. > Is it right? Please can you check this article > <http://www.norconex.com/serving-autocomplete-suggestions-fast/> to see > what I mean? Thank you. > > Regards > Olivier > > > 2015-08-01 17:42 GMT+02:00 Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>: > > > Well, defining what you mean by "autocomplete" would be a start. If it's > > just > > a user types some letters and you suggest the next N terms in the list, > > TermsComponent will fix you right up. > > > > If it's more complicated, the AutoSuggest functionality might help. > > > > If it's correcting spelling, there's the spellchecker. > > > > Best, > > Erick > > > > On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Olivier Austina > > <olivier.aust...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am looking for a fast and easy to maintain way to do autocomplete for > > > large dataset in solr. I heard about Ternary Search Tree (TST) > > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ternary_search_tree>. > > > But I would like to know if there is something I missed such as best > > > practice, Solr new feature. Any suggestion is welcome. Thank you. > > > > > > Regards > > > Olivier > > >
