Hi Ester,
yes, i saw it, but if I use:
q={!join from=fid to=fid}fid:34520196 (with or not &collection=c1,c2)
I have only the result from the collection used in the select/c1
Le 06/01/2016 17:52, esther.quan...@lucidworks.com a écrit :
Hi Bruno,
You might consider using the JoinQueryParser. Details here :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+Parsers#OtherParsers-JoinQueryParser
Best,
Esther
Le 6 janv. 2016 à 08:48, Bruno Mannina <bmann...@free.fr> a écrit :
Same result on my dev' server, it seems that collection param haven't
effect on the query...
Q: I don't see on the solr 5.4 doc, the "collection" param for select
handler, is it always present in 5.4 version ?
Le 06/01/2016 17:38, Bruno Mannina a écrit :
I have a dev' server, I will do some test on it...
Le 06/01/2016 17:31, Susheel Kumar a écrit :
I'll suggest if you can setup some some test data locally and try this
out. This will confirm your understanding.
Thanks,
Susheel
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Bruno Mannina <bmann...@free.fr>
wrote:
Hi Susheel, Emir,
yes I check, and I have one result in c1 and in c2 with the same
query
fid:34520196
http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:xxxx
/solr/c1/select?q=fid:34520196&wt=json&indent=true&fl=id,fid,cc*,st&collection=c1,c2
{ "responseHeader":{ "status":0, "QTime":1, "params":{
"fl":"fid,cc*,st",
"indent":"true", "q":"fid:34520196", "collection":"c1,c2",
"wt":"json"}},
"response":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"docs":[ {
"id":"EP1680447",
"st":"LAPSED",
"fid":"34520196"}]
}
}
http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:xxxx
/solr/c2/select?q=fid:34520196&wt=json&indent=true&fl=id,fid,cc*,st&collection=c1,c2
{
"responseHeader":{
"status":0,
"QTime":0,
"params":{
"fl":"id,fid,cc*,st",
"indent":"true",
"q":"fid:34520196",
"collection":"c1,c2",
"wt":"json"}},
"response":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"docs":[
{
"id":"WO2005040212",
"st":"PENDING",
"cc_CA":"LAPSED",
"cc_EP":"LAPSED",
"cc_JP":"PENDING",
"cc_US":"LAPSED",
"fid":"34520196"}]
}}
I have the same xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:xxxx (server:port).
unique key field C1, C2 : id
id data in C1 is different of id data in C2
Must I config/set something in solr ?
thanks,
Bruno
Le 06/01/2016 14:56, Emir Arnautovic a écrit :
Hi Bruno,
Can you check counts? Is it possible that first page is only with
results
from collection that you sent request to so you assumed it returns
only
results from single collection?
Thanks,
Emir
On 06.01.2016 14:33, Susheel Kumar wrote:
Hi Bruno,
I just tested this scenario in my local solr 5.3.1 and it returned
results
from two identical collections. I doubt if it is broken in 5.4 just
double
check if you are not missing anything else.
Thanks,
Susheel
http://localhost:8983/solr/c1/select?q=id_type%3Ahello&wt=json&indent=true&collection=c1,c2
responseHeader": {"status": 0,"QTime": 98,"params": {"q":
"id_type:hello","
indent": "true","collection": "c1,c2","wt": "json"}},
response": {"numFound": 2,"start": 0,"maxScore": 1,"docs": [{"id":
"1","
id_type": "hello","_version_": 1522623395043213300},{"id":
"3","id_type":"
hello","_version_": 1522623422397415400}]}
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Bruno Mannina <bmann...@free.fr>
wrote:
yes id value is unique in C1 and unique in C2.
id in C1 is never present in C2
id in C2 is never present in C1
Le 06/01/2016 11:12, Binoy Dalal a écrit :
Are Id values for docs in both the collections exactly same?
To get proper results, the ids should be unique across both the
cores.
On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, 15:11 Bruno Mannina <bmann...@free.fr>
wrote:
Hi All,
Solr 5.4, Ubuntu
I thought it was simple to request across two collections with
the
same
schema but not.
I have one solr instance launch. 300 000 records in each
collection.
I try to use this request without having both results:
http://my_adress:my_port
/solr/C1/select?collection=C1,C2&q=fid:34520196&wt=json
this request returns only C1 results and if I do:
http://my_adress:my_port
/solr/C2/select?collection=C1,C2&q=fid:34520196&wt=json
it returns only C2 results.
I have 5 identical fields on both collection
id, fid, st, cc, timestamp
where id is the unique key field.
Can someone could explain me why it doesn't work ?
Thanks a lot !
Bruno
---
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée
par le
logiciel antivirus Avast.
http://www.avast.com
--
Regards,
Binoy Dalal
---
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée
par le
logiciel antivirus Avast.
http://www.avast.com
---
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par
le
logiciel antivirus Avast.
http://www.avast.com
---
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le
logiciel antivirus Avast.
http://www.avast.com
---
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le
logiciel antivirus Avast.
http://www.avast.com
---
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le
logiciel antivirus Avast.
http://www.avast.com
--