Thanks much Eric for checking in detail. Yes I found the first term being left out in pf. Because of that I had some cases where a couple of unwanted records came in the results with higher priority than the normal ones. When I checked they matched from the 2nd term onwards.
As suggested I wud raise a JIRA. Thanks! Mark On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > Looks like a bug in edismax to me when you field-qualify > the terms. > > As an aside, there's no need to specify the field when you only > want it to go against the fields defined in "qf" and "pf" etc. And, > that's a work-around for this particular case. But still: > > So here's what I get on 5x: > q=(erick men truck)&defType=edismax&qf=name&pf=name > correctly returns: > "+((name:erick) (name:men) (name:truck)) (name:"erick men truck")", > > But, > q=name:(erick men truck)&defType=edismax&qf=name&pf=name > incorrectly returns: > "+(name:erick name:men name:truck) (name:"men truck")", > > And this: > q=name:(erick men truck)&defType=edismax&qf=name&pf=features > incorrectly gives this. > > "+(name:erick name:men name:truck) (features:"men truck")", > > Confusingly, the terms (with "erick" left out, strike 1) > goes against the pf field even though it's fully qualified against the > name field. Not entirely sure whether this is intended or not frankly. > > Please go ahead and raise a JIRA. > > Best, > Erick > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Mark Robinson <mark123lea...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > q=productType:(two piece bathtub white) > > &defType=edismax&pf=productType^20.0&qf=productType^15.0 > > > > In the debug section this is what I see:- > > <str name="parsedquery"> > > (+(productType:two productType:piec productType:bathtub > productType:white) > > DisjunctionMaxQuery((productType:"piec bathtub white"^20.0)))/no_coord > > </str> > > > > My question is related to the "pf" (phrases) section of edismax. > > As shown in the debug section why is the phrase taken as "piec bathtub > > white". Why is the first word "two" not considered in the phrase fields > > section. > > I am looking for queries with the words "two piece bathtub white" being > > together to be boosted and not "piece bathtub white" only to be boosted. > > > > Could some one help me understand what I am missing? > > > > Thanks! > > Mark >
