Hi Eric, I have raised a JIRA:- *KYLIN-1644* with the problem mentioned.
Thanks! Mark. On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Mark Robinson <mark123lea...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks much Eric for checking in detail. > Yes I found the first term being left out in pf. > Because of that I had some cases where a couple of unwanted records came > in the results with higher priority than the normal ones. When I checked > they matched from the 2nd term onwards. > > As suggested I wud raise a JIRA. > > Thanks! > Mark > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Looks like a bug in edismax to me when you field-qualify >> the terms. >> >> As an aside, there's no need to specify the field when you only >> want it to go against the fields defined in "qf" and "pf" etc. And, >> that's a work-around for this particular case. But still: >> >> So here's what I get on 5x: >> q=(erick men truck)&defType=edismax&qf=name&pf=name >> correctly returns: >> "+((name:erick) (name:men) (name:truck)) (name:"erick men truck")", >> >> But, >> q=name:(erick men truck)&defType=edismax&qf=name&pf=name >> incorrectly returns: >> "+(name:erick name:men name:truck) (name:"men truck")", >> >> And this: >> q=name:(erick men truck)&defType=edismax&qf=name&pf=features >> incorrectly gives this. >> >> "+(name:erick name:men name:truck) (features:"men truck")", >> >> Confusingly, the terms (with "erick" left out, strike 1) >> goes against the pf field even though it's fully qualified against the >> name field. Not entirely sure whether this is intended or not frankly. >> >> Please go ahead and raise a JIRA. >> >> Best, >> Erick >> >> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Mark Robinson <mark123lea...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > q=productType:(two piece bathtub white) >> > &defType=edismax&pf=productType^20.0&qf=productType^15.0 >> > >> > In the debug section this is what I see:- >> > <str name="parsedquery"> >> > (+(productType:two productType:piec productType:bathtub >> productType:white) >> > DisjunctionMaxQuery((productType:"piec bathtub white"^20.0)))/no_coord >> > </str> >> > >> > My question is related to the "pf" (phrases) section of edismax. >> > As shown in the debug section why is the phrase taken as "piec bathtub >> > white". Why is the first word "two" not considered in the phrase fields >> > section. >> > I am looking for queries with the words "two piece bathtub white" being >> > together to be boosted and not "piece bathtub white" only to be boosted. >> > >> > Could some one help me understand what I am missing? >> > >> > Thanks! >> > Mark >> > >
