Hi David, Thanks for your explanation. I don't see there's a need to to use the gps_0_coordinate and gps_1_coordinate field for the time being, as the query which I'm using are querying directly to the gps field.
Regards, Edwin On 14 June 2016 at 12:39, David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Zheng, > There are a few Solr FieldTypes that are basically composite fields -- a > virtual field of other fields. AFAIK they are all spatial related. You > don't necessarily need to pay attention to the fact that gps_1_coordinate > exists under the hood unless you wish to customize the options on that > field type in the schema. e.g. if you don't need it for filtering (perhaps > using RPT for that) then you can set indexed=false. > ~ David > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 8:43 PM Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Would like to check, what is the use of the gps_0_coordinate and > > gps_1_coordinate > > field then? Is it just to store the data points, or does it have any > other > > use? > > > > When I do the query, I found that we are only querying the gps_field, > which > > is something like this: > > http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/highlight?q=*:*&fq={!geofilt > > pt=1.5,100.0 > > < > http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/highlight?q=*:*&fq=%7B!geofiltpt=1.5,100.0 > > > > sfield=gps d=5} > > > > > > Regards, > > Edwin > > > > On 27 May 2016 at 08:48, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Should be fine. When the location field is > > > re-indexed (as it is with Atomic Updates) > > > the two fields will be filled back in. > > > > > > Best, > > > Erick > > > > > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo > > > <edwinye...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks Erick for your reply. > > > > > > > > It works when I remove the 'stored="true" ' from the gps_0_coordinate > > and > > > > gps_1_coordinate. > > > > > > > > But will this affect the search functions of the gps coordinates in > the > > > > future? > > > > > > > > Yes, I am referring to Atomic Updates. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Edwin > > > > > > > > > > > > On 27 May 2016 at 02:02, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Try removing the 'stored="true" ' from the gps_0_coordinate and > > > >> gps_1_coordinate. > > > >> > > > >> When you say "...tried to do an update on any other fileds" I'm > > assuming > > > >> you're > > > >> talking about Atomic Updates, which require that the destinations of > > > >> copyFields are single valued. Under the covers the location type is > > > >> split and copied to the other two fields so I suspect that's what's > > > going > > > >> on. > > > >> > > > >> And you could also try one of the other types, see: > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Spatial+Search > > > >> > > > >> Best, > > > >> Erick > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:46 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo > > > >> <edwinye...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > Anyone has any solutions to this problem? > > > >> > > > > >> > I tried to remove the gps_0_coordinate and gps_1_coordinate, but I > > > will > > > >> get > > > >> > the following error during indexing. > > > >> > ERROR: [doc=id1] unknown field 'gps_0_coordinate' > > > >> > > > > >> > Regards, > > > >> > Edwin > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > On 25 May 2016 at 11:37, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo < > edwinye...@gmail.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> >> Hi, > > > >> >> > > > >> >> I have an implementation of storing the coordinates in Solr > during > > > >> >> indexing. > > > >> >> During indexing, I will only store the value in the field name > > > ="gps". > > > >> For > > > >> >> the field name = "gps_0_coordinate" and "gps_1_coordinate", the > > value > > > >> will > > > >> >> be auto filled and indexed from the "gps" field. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> <field name="gps" type="location" indexed="true" stored="true" > > > >> required="false"/> > > > >> >> <field name="gps_0_coordinate" type="double" indexed="true" > > > >> stored="true" required="false"/> > > > >> >> <field name="gps_1_coordinate" type="double" indexed="true" > > > >> stored="true" required="false"/> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> But when I tried to do an update on any other fields in the > index, > > > Solr > > > >> >> will try to add another value in the "gps_0_coordinate" and > > > >> >> "gps_1_coordinate". However, as these 2 fields are not > > multi-Valued, > > > it > > > >> >> will lead to an error: > > > >> >> multiple values encountered for non multiValued field > > > gps_0_coordinate: > > > >> >> [1.0,1.0] > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Does anyone knows how we can solve this issue? > > > >> >> > > > >> >> I am using Solr 5.4.0 > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Regards, > > > >> >> Edwin > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > > -- > Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker > LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: > http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com >
