: I'd prefer that the community decide on the best logo. : Choosing #3 on a simple majority when there were 6 variants of #2 to : split the vote, doesn't feel fair. : The fair thing to me looks like a runoff between #2 and #3.
Agreed, but I'd suggest including #9 as well. Between #9,10&11 there was fairly decent vote close to what #3 got and while #10&11 both have some fine detail that's hard to reproduce in smaller versions, 9 is both simple to scale and fairly representative of the group. A simple 1person==1vote runoff of #2, #3, and #9 lasting 72 hours should be quick and fairly representative. Assuming that produces a decent number of votes indicating a concesus there's no need to call a vote of committers anymore then there would be for any other documentation/site change. (Disclaimer: i also didn't vote before, and i plan on abstaining from the runoff, but i'm with yonik: i don't think there was a clear mandate from the community given the number of small variations on similar designs) -Hoss
