The field is of type "text_ws". Is this not recomended. Should I use text
instead?
> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 10:58:35 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Out of memory on Solr sorting> > Hi Sundar,> > > If
> increasing LRU cache helps you:> - you are probably using 'tokenized' field
> for sorting (could you > confirm please?)...> > ...you should use
> 'non-tokenized single-valued non-boolean' for better > performance of
> sorting...> > > Fuad Efendi> ==============> http://www.tokenizer.org> >
> Quoting sundar shankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:> > > Hi all,> > I seemed to have
> found the solution to this problem. > > Apparently, allocating enough virtual
> memory on the server seems to > > only solve on half of the problem. Even
> after allocating 4 gigs of > > Virtual memory on jboss server, I still did
> get the Out of memory on > > sorting.> >> > I didn't how ever notice that the
> LRU cache on my config was set to > > default which was still 512 megs of max
> memory. I had to increase > > that to a round 2 gigs and the sorting did work
> perfectly ok.> >> > Even though I am satisfied that I have found the solution
> to the > > problem, i am still not satisfied to know that Sort consumes so
> much > > memory. In no products have I seen sorting 10 fields take up 1 gig >
> > and half of virtual memory. I am not sure, if there could be a > > better
> implementation of this. But something doesn't seem right to me.> >> > Thanks
> for all your support. It has truly been overwhelming.> >> > Sundar> >> > >
Movies, sports & news! Get your daily entertainment fix, only on live.com Try
it now!
_________________________________________________________________
Searching for the best deals on travel? Visit MSN Travel.
http://msn.coxandkings.co.in/cnk/cnk.do
