If you look in the upper-lerf corner of any reference guide page
you'll see a link to previous versions of the docs and can download
whatever version you are working with back to 4.7 IIRC. I'd download
that and see if there's similar functionality.

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:19 PM, mohan sundaram <mohanmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  I went through the solr references document which you shared in the link.
> Your shared references document pointing to solr version 6.4.0.
>
> The implemented Solr version in my project is 4.9.0.
>
>
> As I mentioned earlier In my solr schema.xml I defined product Arabic name
> field as below:
>
> /*----------------------------------------------*/
>
> <field name="productNameArabic" type="text_ar" indexed="true"
> stored="true"/>
>
>
>
> <fieldType name="text_ar" class="solr.TextField"
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>
>                 <analyzer>
>
>                                 <tokenizer
> class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
>
>
>                                 <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
>
>
>                                 <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory"
> ignoreCase="true" words="lang/stopwords_ar.txt" />
>
>         <filter class="solr.ArabicNormalizationFilterFactory"/>
>
>         <filter class="solr.ArabicStemFilterFactory"/>
>
>     </analyzer>
>
> </fieldType>
>
> /*----------------------------------------------*/
>
>
>
> I am indexing the Arabic content using “text_ar” field type.
>
>
>
>
> *Characters*
>
> *ا*
>
> *أ*
>
> *إ*
>
> *آ*
>
> Shift key Considers for the above
>
> Table 1
>
>
> These are the example of characters where I’m facing the searching
> difficulty.
>
>
>
>
> *Example Indexed words*
>
> *ابرا*
>
> *أبرا*
>
> *إبرا*
>
> *آبرا*
>
> Table 2
>
> These an example of indexed words in Solr.
>
>
>
> *Searching word*
>
> *ابرا*
>
> Table 3
>
>
> Now my problem is, By searching for the above word(table 3) I should get
> all indexed words in table 2 in the output.
>
>
>
> Is Solr version 4.9.0 compatible with Arabic search or do I need to upgrade
> to higher version?
>
>
> Kindly, do let me know if I need to give an example of all characters since
> I gave only for one character which is hamza with alef.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mohan
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mohan,
>>
>> I answered your question on the solr-user list.  Did you see my response?
>>
>> I CC’d you on this email, but you should know that Apache mailing lists
>> won’t automatically send you email unless you have subscribed to the list.
>> For more information, see <http://lucene.apache.org/solr
>> /community.html#mailing-lists-irc>.
>>
>> --
>> Steve
>> www.lucidworks.com
>>
>> > On Jan 29, 2017, at 2:16 PM, mohan sundaram <mohanmc...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > In solr search I want to search with product name using Arabic letters.
>> > While searching, Arabic user can feel little default to search some
>> product
>> > name. Because some characters need to mention while searching.
>> >
>> > Ex: إ أ آ
>> >
>> >
>> > In the above mentioned characters, user can get combination of shift key.
>> > Usually if Arabic people will mention “ ا “  character and will get the
>> > below combined words.
>> >
>> > Ex: إبرا
>> >
>> >
>> > In my solr schema.xml I defined product arabic name field as below
>> >
>> >
>> > <field name="productNameArabic" type="text_ar" indexed="true"
>> > stored="true"/>
>> >
>> >
>> >  <fieldType name="text_ar" class="solr.TextField"
>> > positionIncrementGap="100">
>> >
>> >      <analyzer>
>> >
>> >        <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
>> >
>> >        <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
>> >
>> >        <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory" ignoreCase="true"
>> > words="lang/stopwords_ar.txt" />
>> >
>> >        <filter class="solr.ArabicNormalizationFilterFactory"/>
>> >
>> >        <filter class="solr.ArabicStemFilterFactory"/>
>> >
>> >      </analyzer>
>> >
>> >    </fieldType>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > What changes I have do in schame.xml. Please help me on this.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Regards,
>> > Mohan.N
>> > 096896429683
>>
>>

Reply via email to