No, it's not the case. In both steps I'm indexing documents from the
same set of IDs (I mean the values of the 'id').
Maciej
W dniu 15.02.2017 o 11:07, Emir Arnautovic pisze:
I did not have time to test it or look at the code, but can you check
if it could be the case when there is no document with a, b, c fields
and you are trying to update it with d, e, f using partial update syntax.
Emir
On 15.02.2017 09:25, Maciej Ł. PCSS wrote:
Dear All,
how should I handle the following scenario using SOLRJ? Index a
collection of documents (fill fields a, b, c). Then index the same
collection but this time fill fields d, e, f.
In a pseudo-code it would be: step1(collectionX); step2(collectionX);
solrCommit();
See my observations below:
- first step is done by calling SolrInputDocument.addField(fieldName,
value); and this works fine.
- if I do the same for the second step then all fields in my
documents get removed;
- for that reason I need to call
SolrInputDocument.addField(fieldName, Collections.singletonMap("set",
value)); and then it's fine
- but for some field, if I do the call from above, then the indexed
values are like "{set=value}" instead of just "value".
Can somebody explain this strange behaviour to me?
Regards
Maciej
