Which version of Solr do you use? Is it always the same field? Again,
without checking anything, see if it could be that field is not
multivalue and your value is.
In any case, this is inefficient way of indexing. If possible, stream
both sources ordered by ID and merge them in one input doc and send to
Solr.
Emir
On 15.02.2017 12:24, Maciej Ł. PCSS wrote:
No, it's not the case. In both steps I'm indexing documents from the
same set of IDs (I mean the values of the 'id').
Maciej
W dniu 15.02.2017 o 11:07, Emir Arnautovic pisze:
I did not have time to test it or look at the code, but can you check
if it could be the case when there is no document with a, b, c fields
and you are trying to update it with d, e, f using partial update
syntax.
Emir
On 15.02.2017 09:25, Maciej Ł. PCSS wrote:
Dear All,
how should I handle the following scenario using SOLRJ? Index a
collection of documents (fill fields a, b, c). Then index the same
collection but this time fill fields d, e, f.
In a pseudo-code it would be: step1(collectionX);
step2(collectionX); solrCommit();
See my observations below:
- first step is done by calling
SolrInputDocument.addField(fieldName, value); and this works fine.
- if I do the same for the second step then all fields in my
documents get removed;
- for that reason I need to call
SolrInputDocument.addField(fieldName,
Collections.singletonMap("set", value)); and then it's fine
- but for some field, if I do the call from above, then the indexed
values are like "{set=value}" instead of just "value".
Can somebody explain this strange behaviour to me?
Regards
Maciej
--
Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
