Hendrik, Thanks for your response.
Regarding "But this seems to greatly depend on how your setup looks like and what actions you perform." May I know what are the factors influence and what considerations are to be taken in relation to this? Thanks On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 14:16 Hendrik Haddorp <hendrik.hadd...@gmx.net> wrote: > We did some testing and the performance was strangely even better with > HDFS then the with the local file system. But this seems to greatly > depend on how your setup looks like and what actions you perform. We now > had a patter with lots of small updates and commits and that seems to be > quite a bit slower. We are about to do performance testing on that now. > > The reason we switched to HDFS was largely connected to us using Docker > and Marathon/Mesos. With HDFS the data is in a shared file system and > thus it is possible to move the replica to a different instance on a a > different host. > > regards, > Hendrik > > On 22.11.2017 14:59, Greenhorn Techie wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Good Afternoon!! > > > > While the discussion around issues related to "Solr on HDFS" is live, I > > would like to understand if anyone has done any performance benchmarking > > for both Solr indexing and search between HDFS vs local file system. > > > > Also, from experience, what would the community folks suggest? Solr on > > local file system or Solr on HDFS? Has anyone done a comparative study of > > these choices? > > > > Thanks > > > >
