> At this point, it's roll your own. That's where I'm getting bogged down - I'm confused by the various queryparser classes in lucene and solr and I'm not sure exactly what I need to override. Do you know of an example of something similar to what I'm doing that I could use as a reference?
> I'd love to see the BTQ in Solr > (and Spans!), but I wonder if it makes sense w/o better indexing side > support. I assume you are rolling your own Analyzer, right? Yup - I'm pretty sure I have that side figured out. My input contains terms marked up with a score (ie 'software?7') I just needed to create a TokenFilter that parses out the suffix and sets the Payload on the token. > Spans and payloads are this huge untapped area for better search! Completely agree - we do a lot with keyword searching, and we use this type of thing in our existing search implementation. Thanks for the quick response! > On Sep 23, 2008, at 5:12 PM, Ensdorf Ken wrote: > > > Hi- > > > > I'm new to Solr, and I'm trying to figure out the best way to > > configure it to use BoostingTermQuery in the scoring mechanism. Do > > I need to create a custom query parser? All I want is the default > > parser behavior except to get the custom term boost from the Payload > > data. Thanks! > > > > -Ken > > -------------------------- > Grant Ingersoll > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > Lucene Helpful Hints: > http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance > http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ > > > > > > > >
