rsync has an option to limit the transfer rate. You give a maximum bandwidth
for it to use in the transfer.

(Please do not post the same thing if you don't get a response.)

-----Original Message-----
From: rahul_k123 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 10:57 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Snappuller taking up CPU on master


Any Ideas???

rahul_k123 wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for the reply.
> 
> I am not using SOLR for indexing and serving search requests, i am 
> using only the scripts for replication.
> 
> Yes it looks like I/O, but my question is how to handle this problem 
> and is there any optimal way to achieve this.
> 
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Can't tell with certainty without looking, but my guess would be slow 
>> disk, high IO, and a large number of processes waiting for IO (run 
>> vmstat and look at the "wa" column).
>> 
>> Otis
>> --
>> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> From: rahul_k123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 6:56:48 PM
>>> Subject: Snappuller taking up CPU on master
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I am using snappuller to sync my slave with master, i am not using 
>>> rsync daemon, i am doing Rsync using remote shell.
>>> 
>>> When i am serving requests from the master when the snappuller is 
>>> running (after optimization, total index is arnd 4 gb it doing the 
>>> transfer of whole index), the performance is very bad actually 
>>> causing timeouts.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Any ideas why this happens .
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Any suggestions will help.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks.
>>> --
>>> View this message in context: 
>>> http://www.nabble.com/Snappuller-taking-up-CPU-on-master-tp19638474p
>>> 19638474.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at 
>>> Nabble.com.
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Snappuller-taking-up-CPU-on-master-tp19638474p19654506
.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Reply via email to