Hello, Bram. Something like that is possible in principle, but it will take enormous efforts to tackle exact syntax. Why not something like children.fq=-parent:true ?
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:52 PM Bram Biesbrouck < bram.biesbro...@reinvention.be> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm struggling with a little period-sign difficulty and instead of pulling > out my hair, I wonder if any of you could help me out... > > Here's the query: > q=uri:"/en/blah"&fl=id,uri,children:[subquery]&children.q={!prefix f=id v=$ > row.id}&children.fl=* > > It just searches for a document with the field "uri" set to "/en/blah". > For every hit (just one), it tries to manually fetch the subdocuments using > the id field of the hit since its children have id's like > <parent-id>.<child-id>. > Note that I know this should be done with nested documents and the > ChildDocTransformer... this is just an exercise to train my brain... > > The query above works fine. However, it also returns the parent document, > because the prefix search includes it as well, of course. However, if I'm > changing the subquery to something along the lines of this: > > {!prefix f=id v=concat($row.id,".")} > or > {!prefix f=id v="$row.id\.")} > or > {!query defType=lucene v=concat("id:",$row.id,".")} > > I get no results back. > > I feel like I'm missing only a simple thing here, but can't seem to > pinpoint it. > > Any help? > > b. > <http://www.reinvention.be> *We do video technology* > Visit our new website! <http://www.reinvention.be> *Bram Biesbrouck* > bram.biesbro...@reinvention.be > +32 486 118280 <0032%20486%20118280> > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev