Thanks for the reply. Currently we are migrating from solr4 to solr8 under solr 4 we wrote our own highlighter because the provided one was too slow for our documents.
We deal with many large documents, but we have full term vectors already. So as I understand it from my reading of the code the unified highlighter should be fast even on these large documents. The concern about alternate fields was if the highlighter was slow we could just return highlights from one field if they existed and if not then highlight the other fields. >From my research I'm leaning towards returning highlights from all the fields >we are interested in because I feel it will be fast. Eric Allen - Software Devloper, NetDocuments eric.al...@netdocuments.com | O: 801.989.9691 | C: 801.989.9691 -----Original Message----- From: sasarun <sasa...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 2:45 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Highlighting Solr 8 Hi Eric, Unified highlighter does not have an option to provide alternate field when highlighting. That option is available with Orginal and fast vector highlighter. As indicated in the Solr documentation, Unified is the recommended method for highlighting to meet most of the use cases. Please do share more details in case you are facing any specific issue with highlighting. Thanks, Arun -- Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html