Thanks for the reply.

Currently we are migrating from solr4 to solr8 under solr 4 we wrote our own 
highlighter because the provided one was too slow for our documents.

We deal with many large documents, but we have full term vectors already.  So 
as I understand it from my reading of the code the unified highlighter should 
be fast even on these large documents.

The concern about alternate fields was if the highlighter was slow we could 
just return highlights from one field if they existed and if not then highlight 
the other fields.

>From my research I'm leaning towards returning highlights from all the fields 
>we are interested in because I feel it will be fast.

Eric Allen - Software Devloper, NetDocuments
eric.al...@netdocuments.com | O: 801.989.9691 | C: 801.989.9691

-----Original Message-----
From: sasarun <sasa...@gmail.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 2:45 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Highlighting Solr 8

Hi Eric,

Unified highlighter does not have an option to provide alternate field when 
highlighting. That option is available with Orginal and fast vector 
highlighter. As indicated in the Solr documentation, Unified is the recommended 
method for highlighting to meet most of the use cases. Please do share more 
details in case you are facing any specific issue with highlighting. 

Thanks,

Arun 




--
Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

Reply via email to