Correcting some typos ... Thanks, Eric.
1) We are using dynamic string field for faceting where indexing =false and stored=false . By default docValues are enabled for primitive fields (solr 6.6.), so not explicitly defined in schema. Do you think its wrong assumption? Also I do not see this field listed in feild cache, but don't see any dynamic fields listed. 2) Autowarm count is at 32 for both and autowarm time is 25 for query-result cache and 1724 for filter cache 3)Can you elaborate what you mean here. We have hard-commit every 5 mins with opensearcher=false and soft-commit every 2 secs. On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 4:06 PM Revas <revas2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, Eric. > > 1) We are using dynamic string field for faceting where indexing =false > and stored=false . By default docValues are enabled for primitive fields > (solr 6.6.), so not explicitly defined in schema. Do you think its wrong > assumption? Also I do not this field listed in feild cache, but dont see > any dynamic fields listed. > 2) Autowarm count is at 32 for both and autowarm time is 25 for > queryresult and 17 > 3)Can you elaborate what you mean here > > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 1:43 PM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Response spikes after commits are almost always something to do >> with autowarming or docValues being set to false. So here’s what >> I’d look at, in order. >> >> 1> are the fields used defined with docValues=true? They should be. >> With this much variance it sounds like you don’t have that value set. >> You’ll have to rebuild your entire index, first deleting all documents… >> >> You assert that they are all docValues, but the variance is so >> high that I wonder whether they _all_ are. They may very well be, but >> I’ve been tripped up by things I know are true that aren’t too often ;) >> >> You can insure this by setting 'uninvertible=“true” ‘ in your field type, >> see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12962 if you’re on >> 7.6 or later. >> >> 2>what are your autowarming settings for queryResultCache and/or >> filterCache. Start with a relatively small number, say 16 and look at >> your autowarm times to insure they aren’t excessive. >> >> 3> if autowarming doesn’t help, consider specifying a newSearcher >> event in solrconfig.xml that exercises the facets. >> >> NOTE: <2> and <3> will mask any fields that are docValues=false that >> slipped through the cracks, so I’d double check <1> first. >> >> Best, >> Erick >> >> > On Mar 30, 2020, at 12:20 PM, sujatha arun <revas2...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > A facet heavy query which uses docValue fields for faceting returns >> about >> > 5k results executes between 10ms to 5 secs and the 5 secs time seems to >> > coincide with after a hard commit. >> > >> > Does that have any relation? Why the fluctuation in execution time? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Revas >> >>
