Is this odd use-case where one needs to convert Lucene query to Solr query? Isn't this normal use-case when somebody is trying to port their Lucene code to Solr? I mean, is it like a XY problem where I should not even run into this problem in the first place?
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 9:40 AM Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> wrote: > There's nothing like this now. Presumably one might visit queries and > generate Query DSL json, but it might be a challenging problem. > > On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 3:42 AM gnandre <arnoldbron...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I think this question here in this thread is similar to my question. > > > > > https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene-Query-to-Solr-query-td493751.html > > > > > > As suggested in that thread, I do not want to use toString method for > > Lucene query to pass it to the q param in SolrQuery. > > > > I am looking for a function that accepts org.apache.lucene.search.Query > and > > returns org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrQuery. Is that possible? > > > > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 8:08 AM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > edismas is quite different from straight Lucene. > > > > > > Try attaching &debug=query to the input and > > > you’ll see the difference. > > > > > > Best, > > > Erick > > > > > > > On May 30, 2020, at 12:32 AM, gnandre <arnoldbron...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I have following query which works fine as a lucene query: > > > > +(topics:132)^0.02607211 (topics:146)^0.008187325 > > > > -asset_id:doc:en:index.html > > > > > > > > But, it does not work if I use it as a solr query with lucene as > > defType. > > > > > > > > For it to work, I need to convert it like following: > > > > q=+((topics:132)^0.02607211 (topics:146)^0.008187325 > > > > +(-(asset_id:doc\:en\:index.html))&defType=edismax&q.op=OR > > > > > > > > Why does it not work as is? AFAIK syntax given in the first query is > > > > supported by edismax. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Sincerely yours > Mikhail Khludnev >
