Is autowarm count of 0 a good idea, though? If you don't want to autowarm any caches, doesn't that imply that you have very low hit rate and therefore don't care to autowarm? And if you have a very low hit rate, then perhaps caches are not needed at all?
How about this. Do you optimize your index at any point? Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch ----- Original Message ---- > From: wojtekpia <wojte...@hotmail.com> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2009 1:07:28 PM > Subject: RE: Snapinstaller vs Solr Restart > > > Sorry, I forgot to include that. All my autowarmcount's are set to 0. > > > Feak, Todd wrote: > > > > First suspect would be Filter Cache settings and Query Cache settings. > > > > If they are auto-warming at all, then there is a definite difference > > between the first start behavior and the post-commit behavior. This > > affects what's in memory, caches, etc. > > > > -Todd Feak > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Snapinstaller-vs-Solr-Restart-tp21315273p21315654.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
