We can use a simple reflection based implementation to simplify reading too many parameters.
What I wish to emphasize is that Solr should be agnostic of xml altogether. It should only be aware of specific Objects and interfaces. If users wish to plugin something else in some other way , it should be fine There is a huge learning involved in learning the current solrconfig.xml . Let us not make people throw away that . On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 1:59 AM, Jason Rutherglen <jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Over the weekend I may write a patch to allow simple reflection based > injection from within solrconfig. > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Yonik Seeley > <yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar >> <shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I was wondering if there is a way I can modify calibrateSizeByDeletes just >>>> by configuration ? >>>> >>> >>> Alas, no. The only option that I see for you is to sub-class >>> LogByteSizeMergePolicy and set calibrateSizeByDeletes to true in the >>> constructor. However, please open a Jira issue and so we don't forget about >>> it. >> >> It's the continuing stuff like this that makes me feel like we should >> be Spring (or equivalent) based someday... I'm just not sure how we're >> going to get there. >> >> -Yonik >> http://www.lucidimagination.com >> > -- ----------------------------------------------------- Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com
