I opened SOLR-1447 for this
2009/9/18 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <noble.p...@corp.aol.com>: > We can use a simple reflection based implementation to simplify > reading too many parameters. > > What I wish to emphasize is that Solr should be agnostic of xml > altogether. It should only be aware of specific Objects and > interfaces. If users wish to plugin something else in some other way , > it should be fine > > > There is a huge learning involved in learning the current > solrconfig.xml . Let us not make people throw away that . > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 1:59 AM, Jason Rutherglen > <jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Over the weekend I may write a patch to allow simple reflection based >> injection from within solrconfig. >> >> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Yonik Seeley >> <yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar >>> <shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> I was wondering if there is a way I can modify calibrateSizeByDeletes just >>>>> by configuration ? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Alas, no. The only option that I see for you is to sub-class >>>> LogByteSizeMergePolicy and set calibrateSizeByDeletes to true in the >>>> constructor. However, please open a Jira issue and so we don't forget about >>>> it. >>> >>> It's the continuing stuff like this that makes me feel like we should >>> be Spring (or equivalent) based someday... I'm just not sure how we're >>> going to get there. >>> >>> -Yonik >>> http://www.lucidimagination.com >>> >> > > > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------- > Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com >
