Looks like you have a huge document cache, and the warming query must have a really high "rows". Can you lower the rows to something like 10 on the master?
-Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Jeff Newburn <jnewb...@zappos.com> wrote: > The warmers return 11 fields: > 3 Strings > 2 booleans > 2 doubles > 2 longs > 1 sint (solr.SortableIntField) > > Let me know if you need the fields actually be searched on. > > name: fieldCache > class: org.apache.solr.search.SolrFieldCacheMBean > version: 1.0 > description: Provides introspection of the Lucene FieldCache, this is > **NOT** a cache that is managed by Solr. > stats: entries_count : 0 > insanity_count : 0 > > name: documentCache > class: org.apache.solr.search.LRUCache > version: 1.0 > description: LRU Cache(maxSize=100000, initialSize=75000) > stats: lookups : 22620 > hits : 337 > hitratio : 0.01 > inserts : 22282 > evictions : 0 > size : 22282 > warmupTime : 0 > cumulative_lookups : 22620 > cumulative_hits : 337 > cumulative_hitratio : 0.01 > cumulative_inserts : 22282 > cumulative_evictions : 0 > > > name: fieldValueCache > class: org.apache.solr.search.FastLRUCache > version: 1.0 > description: Concurrent LRU Cache(maxSize=10000, initialSize=10, > minSize=9000, acceptableSize=9500, cleanupThread=false) > stats: lookups : 0 > hits : 0 > hitratio : 0.00 > inserts : 0 > evictions : 0 > size : 0 > warmupTime : 0 > cumulative_lookups : 0 > cumulative_hits : 0 > cumulative_hitratio : 0.00 > cumulative_inserts : 0 > cumulative_evictions : 0 > > -- > Jeff Newburn > Software Engineer, Zappos.com > jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562 > > >> From: Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com> >> Reply-To: <solr-user@lucene.apache.org> >> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:04:27 -0400 >> To: <solr-user@lucene.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: Solr Trunk Heap Space Issues >> >> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Jeff Newburn wrote: >>>> that side change enough to push up the memory limits where we would run out >>>> like this? >>>> >>> Yes - now give us the FieldCache section from the stats section please :) >> >> And the fieldValueCache section too (used for multi-valued faceting). >> >> -Yonik >> http://www.lucidimagination.com > >
