Hi, You could use a copyField against all fields and then AND the query terms given. Quite restrictive but all terms would then have to be present to match. I'm still a relative newbie to Solr so perhaps I'm horribly wrong.
Cheers Nick On 13 May 2010, at 18:18, surajit wrote: > > Understood and I can work with that limitation by using separate > fields during indexing. However, my search interface is just a text > box like Google and I need to take the query and return only those > documents that match ALL terms in the query and if I am going to take > the query and match it against each field (separately), how do I get > back documents matching all user terms? One soln I can think of is to > take all the field-specific analysis out of solr and do it as a > pre-process step, but want to make sure there isn't an alternative > within Solr. > > surajit > > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Chris Hostetter-3 [via Lucene] > <ml-node+815302-427668360-263...@n3.nabble.com> wrote: >> : which is good, but the different fields that I copy into the copyfield >> need >> : different analysis and I no longer am able to do that. I can, of course, >> >> Fundementally, Solr can only apply a single analysis chain to all of >> the text in a given field -- regardless of where it may be copied from. >> if it didn't, there would be no way to get matches at query time. >> >> the query analysis has to "make sense" for the index analysis, so it has >> to be consistent. >> >> >> >> -Hoss >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> View message @ >> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/synonyms-not-working-with-copyfield-tp814108p815302.html >> To unsubscribe from Re: synonyms not working with copyfield, click here. >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/synonyms-not-working-with-copyfield-tp814108p815426.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
