I've run into this before too. Both the dismax and solr-lucene _query parsers_ will tokenize a query on whitespace _before_ they pass the query to any field analyzers. There are some reasons for this, lots of things wouldn't work if they didn't do this.

But it makes your approach kind of hard. Try doing your search as a phrase search with double quotes, "apple pie", I bet it'll work then -- because both dismax and solr-lucene will respect the phrase quotes and NOT tokenize the stuff inside there before it gets to the field analyzers.

So if non-tokenized fields like this are all that are included in your search, and if you can get your client application to just force phrase quoting of everything before sending to Solr, that might work. Otherwise.... I don't know of a good solution. If you figure one out, let me know.

Jonathan

Jeff Rose wrote:
Hi,
  We are using SOLR to match query strings with a keyword database, where
some of the keywords are actually more than one word.  For example a keyword
might be "apple pie" and we only want it to match for a query containing
that word pair, but not one only containing "apple".  Here is the relevant
piece of the schema.xml, defining the index and query pipelines:

  <fieldType name="text" class="solr.TextField" positionIncrementGap="100">
     <analyzer type="index">
       <tokenizer class="solr.PatternTokenizerFactory" pattern=";"/>
        <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
        <filter class="solr.TrimFilterFactory" />
     </analyzer>
     <analyzer type="query">
        <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>
<filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
        <filter class="solr.TrimFilterFactory" />
<filter class="solr.ShingleFilterFactory" />
      </analyzer>
   </fieldType>

In the analysis tool this schema looks like it works correctly.  Our
multi-word keywords are indexed as a single entry, and then when a search
phrase contains one of these multi-word keywords it is shingled and matched.
 Unfortunately, when we do the same queries on top of the actual index it
responds with zero matches.  I can see in the index histogram that the terms
are correctly indexed from our mysql datasource containing the keywords, but
somehow the shingling doesn't appear to work on this live data.  Does anyone
have experience with shingling that might have some tips for us, or
otherwise advice for debugging the issue?

Thanks,
Jeff

Reply via email to