That looks...er...unfortunate. The very first thing I'd do is check your
index
and see if there are such weird values in your facet fields. My guess is
that SOLR is working fine, but you somehow have garbage values
in your index, but that's only a guess. I'd try that before trying to
debug, GIGO.
Which wouldn't answer the question of how the garbage got in there
in the first place, posting your field type definition for your
faceted fields would help with that question.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Dennis Schafroth <den...@indexdata.com>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Running on a Debian 5.0.5 64bit box. Using
> solr-1.4.1 with Java version "1.6.0_20"
>
> I am seeing weird facets results along with the "right" looking ones.
> Garbled data, stuff that looks like a buffer overflow / index off by ...
>
> And I even get them when I do a zero hit search. I wouldn't expect any
> facets:
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <response>
> <lst name="responseHeader">
> <int name="status">0</int>
> <int name="QTime">56</int>
> <lst name="params">
> <str name="facet">true</str>
> <str name="shards">satay:8985/solr</str>
> <str name="start">0</str>
> <str name="q">title:xzyzx</str>
> <str name="f.date.facet.limit">10</str>
> <str name="f.subject_exact.facet.limit">10</str>
> <arr name="facet.field">
> <str>author_exact</str>
> <str>date</str>
> <str>subject_exact</str>
> </arr>
> <str name="f.author_exact.facet.limit">10</str>
> <str name="rows">20</str>
> </lst>
> </lst>
> <result name="response" numFound="0" start="0"/>
> <lst name="facet_counts">
> <lst name="facet_queries"/>
> <lst name="facet_fields">
> <lst name="author_exact">
> <int name=" ">0</int>
> <int name=" !;;!">0</int>
> <int name=" (Domingo, Juan); Imprenta Tormentaria (Córdoba)">0</
> int>
> <int name=" (Supervisor)">0</int>
> <int name=" *">0</int>
> <int name=" * ">0</int>
> <int name=" * (μτφρ.)">0</int>
> <int name=" * * * ">0</int>
> <int name=" * * * (μτφρ.)">0</int>
> <int name=" * * * *">0</int>
> </lst>
> <lst name="date">
> <int name="0000">0</int>
> <int name="0001">0</int>
> <int name="0002">0</int>
> <int name="0003">0</int>
> <int name="0004">0</int>
> <int name="0005">0</int>
> <int name="0006">0</int>
> <int name="0007">0</int>
> <int name="0008">0</int>
> <int name="0009">0</int>
> </lst>
> <lst name="subject_exact">
> <int name=" ">0</int>
> <int name=" ! ! R P R">0</int>
> <int name=" !!rrqqyyhqhqwwllrqrqdd!!vvddvv">0</int>
> <int name=" !""$%"( )*+,($"(">0</int>
> <int name=" !()+, -./01 23456">0</int>
> <int name=" !-decidable and decidable deductive procedures for a
> restricted FTL with Unless">0</int>
> <int name=" !<f87.03...">0</int>
> <int name=" ")338-8570">0</int>
> <int name=" "-Optimization Schemes and L-Bit Precision:
> Alternative Perspectives in Combinatorial Optimization">0</int>
> <int name=" "A picture is worth 1K words"">0</int>
> </lst>
> </lst>
> <lst name="facet_dates"/>
> </lst>
> </response>
>
>
> I tried to look for a bug report, but haven't been able to find one that
> matches. I will try to setup a debug session to get closer, but would love to
> get feedback if this is a know issue.
>
> cheers,
>
> :-Dennis Schafroth
>
>
>
