I am definitely not excluding the idea that index is garbled, but.. it doesn't explain that I get facets on zero hit.
The schema is as following:
satay.xml
Description: XML document
where I have copied field for the facets (author_exact, subject_exact,
title_exact), as I don't want tokenization on these.
the request has the following parameters:
facet=true&start=0&q=title:xyzy&f.date.facet.limit=10&f.subject_exact.facet.limit=10&facet.field=author_exact&facet.field=date&facet.field=subject_exact&f.author_exact.facet.limit=10&rows=20
I haven't been able to reproduce it in a test index yet, but I do have two
different index that show similar problem (facets on zero hits).
cheers,
:-Dennis Schafroth
On 09/09/2010, at 15.10, Erick Erickson wrote:
> That looks...er...unfortunate. The very first thing I'd do is check your
> index
> and see if there are such weird values in your facet fields. My guess is
> that SOLR is working fine, but you somehow have garbage values
> in your index, but that's only a guess. I'd try that before trying to
> debug, GIGO.
>
> Which wouldn't answer the question of how the garbage got in there
> in the first place, posting your field type definition for your
> faceted fields would help with that question.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Dennis Schafroth <den...@indexdata.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Running on a Debian 5.0.5 64bit box. Using
>> solr-1.4.1 with Java version "1.6.0_20"
>>
>> I am seeing weird facets results along with the "right" looking ones.
>> Garbled data, stuff that looks like a buffer overflow / index off by ...
>>
>> And I even get them when I do a zero hit search. I wouldn't expect any
>> facets:
>>
>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> <response>
>> <lst name="responseHeader">
>> <int name="status">0</int>
>> <int name="QTime">56</int>
>> <lst name="params">
>> <str name="facet">true</str>
>> <str name="shards">satay:8985/solr</str>
>> <str name="start">0</str>
>> <str name="q">title:xzyzx</str>
>> <str name="f.date.facet.limit">10</str>
>> <str name="f.subject_exact.facet.limit">10</str>
>> <arr name="facet.field">
>> <str>author_exact</str>
>> <str>date</str>
>> <str>subject_exact</str>
>> </arr>
>> <str name="f.author_exact.facet.limit">10</str>
>> <str name="rows">20</str>
>> </lst>
>> </lst>
>> <result name="response" numFound="0" start="0"/>
>> <lst name="facet_counts">
>> <lst name="facet_queries"/>
>> <lst name="facet_fields">
>> <lst name="author_exact">
>> <int name=" ">0</int>
>> <int name=" !;;!">0</int>
>> <int name=" (Domingo, Juan); Imprenta Tormentaria (Córdoba)">0</
>> int>
>> <int name=" (Supervisor)">0</int>
>> <int name=" *">0</int>
>> <int name=" * ">0</int>
>> <int name=" * (μτφρ.)">0</int>
>> <int name=" * * * ">0</int>
>> <int name=" * * * (μτφρ.)">0</int>
>> <int name=" * * * *">0</int>
>> </lst>
>> <lst name="date">
>> <int name="0000">0</int>
>> <int name="0001">0</int>
>> <int name="0002">0</int>
>> <int name="0003">0</int>
>> <int name="0004">0</int>
>> <int name="0005">0</int>
>> <int name="0006">0</int>
>> <int name="0007">0</int>
>> <int name="0008">0</int>
>> <int name="0009">0</int>
>> </lst>
>> <lst name="subject_exact">
>> <int name=" ">0</int>
>> <int name=" ! ! R P R">0</int>
>> <int name=" !!rrqqyyhqhqwwllrqrqdd!!vvddvv">0</int>
>> <int name=" !""$%"( )*+,($"(">0</int>
>> <int name=" !()+, -./01 23456">0</int>
>> <int name=" !-decidable and decidable deductive procedures for a
>> restricted FTL with Unless">0</int>
>> <int name=" !<f87.03...">0</int>
>> <int name=" ")338-8570">0</int>
>> <int name=" "-Optimization Schemes and L-Bit Precision:
>> Alternative Perspectives in Combinatorial Optimization">0</int>
>> <int name=" "A picture is worth 1K words"">0</int>
>> </lst>
>> </lst>
>> <lst name="facet_dates"/>
>> </lst>
>> </response>
>>
>>
>> I tried to look for a bug report, but haven't been able to find one that
>> matches. I will try to setup a debug session to get closer, but would love
>> to get feedback if this is a know issue.
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> :-Dennis Schafroth
>>
>>
>>
