Ahh, LOL! I wouldn't have thought about that unless I were fixing the issues that you guys have worked on.
Dennis Gearon Signature Warning ---------------- It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a better idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you do not have to make them yourself. from 'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036' EARTH has a Right To Life, otherwise we all die. --- On Wed, 10/13/10, Jan Høydahl / Cominvent <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: > From: Jan Høydahl / Cominvent <jan....@cominvent.com> > Subject: Re: LuceneRevolution - NoSQL: A comparison > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Date: Wednesday, October 13, 2010, 3:32 PM > You don't know what documents to > bring up summaries for before you have merged and sorted the > docIds from all shards. And you don't want to waste > resources by fetching it all. Example: > Phase 1 request: q=foo bar&rows=10&sort=price > asc&shards=node1:8983,node2:8983,node3:8983 > Phase 1 response: The doc-ids of the 10 lowest prices > products from each of the three shards (total 30) > Phase 2 request: Request the summaries based on IDs. This > may be 3+3+4, 10+0+0, 1+1+8 or any other distribution > Phase 2 response: The actual summaries from each shard > > -- > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > > On 13. okt. 2010, at 19.04, Dennis Gearon wrote: > > > I think that's good thinking. I wonder, do the two > phases have to be invoked externally by two queries, or why > couldn't it be all self contained in each instance behind > the load leveler? > > > > Just curious how it works. > > > > Dennis Gearon > > > > Signature Warning > > ---------------- > > It is always a good idea to learn from your own > mistakes. It is usually a better idea to learn from > others’ mistakes, so you do not have to make them > yourself. from > 'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036' > > > > EARTH has a Right To Life, > > otherwise we all die. > > > > > > --- On Wed, 10/13/10, Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com> > wrote: > > > >> From: Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com> > >> Subject: Re: LuceneRevolution - NoSQL: A > comparison > >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > >> Date: Wednesday, October 13, 2010, 5:46 AM > >> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Jan > >> Høydahl / Cominvent > >> <jan....@cominvent.com> > >> wrote: > >>> I'm pretty sure the 2nd phase to fetch > doc-summaries > >> goes directly to same server as first phase. But > what if you > >> stick a LB in between? > >> > >> A related point - the load balancing > implementation that's > >> part of > >> SolrCloud (and looks like it will be committed to > trunk > >> soon), does > >> keep track of what server it used for the first > phase and > >> uses that > >> for subsequent phases. > >> > >> -Yonik > >> http://www.lucidimagination.com > >> > >
