mrw wrote: > > > We're actually using the default facet.limit value of 100. I will > increase it to 200 and see if the non-zero-count facets show up. Maybe > that was causing my confusion. >
Yep -- the 0-count facets were not being returned due to the facet.limit cutoff. So, unless there is another parameter that can be used with facet.mincount=0 in order to tune the results, it looks like I will need to use facet.mincount=1 and handle the processing of omitted facets in the application. Thanks for the help. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Adding-fq-to-query-with-mincount-0-causes-unexpected-0-count-facet-values-to-be-returned-tp2236105p2236801.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
