You are welcome.

By new field I meant if you don't have a field for UserType already.

On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Stefan Matheis <
matheis.ste...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Salman,
>
> talking with others about problems really helps. Adding another FilterQuery
> is a bit too much - but combining both is working fine!
>
> not seen the wood for the trees =)
> Thanks, Stefan
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Salman Akram <
> salman.ak...@northbaysolutions.net> wrote:
>
> > You can index a field which can the User types e.g. UserType (possible
> > values can be TypeA,TypeB and so on...) and then you can just do
> >
> > ?q=name:Stefan&fq=UserType:TypeB
> >
> > BTW you can even increase the size of maxBooleanClauses but in this case
> > definitely this is not a good idea. Also you would hit the max limit of
> > HTTP
> > GET so you will have to change it to POST. Better handle it with a new
> > field.
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Stefan Matheis <
> > matheis.ste...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi List,
> > >
> > > we are sometimes reaching the maxBooleanClauses Limit (which is 1024,
> per
> > > default). So, the used query looks like:
> > >
> > > ?q=name:Stefan&fq=5 10 12 15 16 [...]
> > >
> > > where the values are ids of users, which the current user is allowed to
> > see
> > > - so long, nothing special. sometimes the filter-query includes
> user-ids
> > > from an different Type of User (let's say we have TypeA and TypeB)
> where
> > > TypeB contains more then 2k users. Then we hit the given Limit.
> > >
> > > Now the Question is .. is it possible to enable an
> > Filter/Function/Feature
> > > in Solr, which it makes possible, that we don't need to send over alle
> > the
> > > user ids from TypeB Users? Just to tell Solr "include all TypeB Users
> in
> > > the
> > > (given) FilterQuery" (or something in that direction)?
> > >
> > > If so, what's the Name of this Filter/Function/Feature? :)
> > >
> > > Don't hesitate to ask, if my question/description is weird!
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Stefan
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Salman Akram
> >
>



-- 
Regards,

Salman Akram

Reply via email to