> - yes, i think so, thats the reason because i dont understand the > wiki-article ...
Maybe the article is out of date? I think it's grossly inefficient to warm the searchers at all in the NRT case. Queries are being performed across *all* segments, even though there should only be 1 that's new that may require warming. However given the new segment's so small, there should be no reason to warm it at all? On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:14 AM, stockii <stock.jo...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> it'll negatively impact the desired goal of low latency new index readers? > - yes, i think so, thats the reason because i dont understand the > wiki-article ... > > i set the warmupCount to 500 and i got no error messages, that solr isnt > available ... > but solr-stats.jsp show me a warmuptime of "warmupTime : 12174 " why ? > > is the warmuptime in solrconfig.xml the maximum time in ms, for autowarming > ? or what does it really means ? > > ----- > ------------------------------- System > ---------------------------------------- > > One Server, 12 GB RAM, 2 Solr Instances, 7 Cores, > 1 Core with 31 Million Documents other Cores < 100.000 > > - Solr1 for Search-Requests - commit every Minute - 5GB Xmx > - Solr2 for Update-Request - delta every Minute - 4GB Xmx > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/NRT-and-warmupTime-of-filterCache-tp2654886p2659560.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
