No - this is all running against an external tomcat-based solr. I'm
back to being mystified now. Maybe I'll see if I can isolate this a bit
more. I'll post back if I do, although I'm beginning to wonder if we
should just move to 3.1 and not worry about it.
-Mike
On 5/2/2011 8:39 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
On 5/2/2011 8:02 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
Huh?
No ... that's not true at all.
A commit using SolrJ is no differnet then a commit via HTTP ...
especially
since that's all SOlrJ is doing when you ask it to commit.
Unless you're using the 'embedded' solr server? Wonder if the OP is.
Jonathan
