@ Pravesh: It's 2 seperate cores, not 2 indexes. Sorry for that. @ Erick: Yes, I've seen this suggestion and it seems to be the only possible solution. I'll look into it.
Thanks for your answers guys! Kurt On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>wrote: > If I read this correctly, one approach is to specify an > increment gap in a multiValued field, then search for phrases > with a slop less than that increment gap. i.e. > incrementGap=100 in your definition, and search for > "apple orange"~99 > > If this is gibberish, please post some examples and we'll > try something else. > > Best > Erick > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Kurt Sultana <kurtanat...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We're using Solr to search on a Shop index and a Product index. Currently > a > > Shop has a field `shop_keyword` which also contains the keywords of the > > products assigned to it. The shop keywords are separated by a space. > > Consequently, if there is a product which has a keyword "apple" and > another > > which has "orange", a search for shops having `Apple AND Orange` would > > return the shop for these products. > > > > However, this is incorrect since we want that a search for shops having > > `Apple AND Orange` returns shop(s) having products with both "apple" and > > "orange" as keywords. > > > > We tried solving this problem, by making shop keywords multi-valued and > > assigning the keywords of every product of the shop as a new value in > shop > > keywords. However as was confirmed in another post > > > http://markmail.org/thread/xce4qyzs5367yplo#query:+page:1+mid:76eerw5yqev2aanu+state:results > , > > Solr does not support "all words must match in the same value of a > > multi-valued field". > > > > (Hope I explained myself well) > > > > How can we go about this? Ideally, we shouldn't change our search > > infrastructure dramatically. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Krt_Malta > > >
