Have fun. Note that the intent is to have the logging/record keeping in the superclass (whose name escapes me) and each update type should be able to use that....
Best Erick On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:15 PM, karthik <kmoha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Erick. Will certainly take a look. > > I am looking to do this for binary objects since i have started with that. > > -- karthik > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Erick Erickson > <erickerick...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Take a look at SOLR-445, I started down this road a while >> ago but then got distracted. If you'd like to pick it up and >> take it farther, feel free. I haven't applied that patch in a >> while, so I don't know how easy it will be to apply. >> >> Last I left it, it would do much of what you're asking for for >> xml documents fed to solr, and I was going to get around to >> some of the other input types but haven't yet. That was what >> committing this was waiting on. >> >> Best >> Erick >> >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:39 PM, karthik <kmoha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi Everyone, >> > >> > I am trying to use Solrj to add documents to my solr index. In the >> process >> > of playing around with the implementation I noticed that when we add >> > documents in a batch to Solr the response back from solr is just - status >> & >> > qtime. I am using Solr 3.1 right now. >> > >> > I came across the following scenario that I would like to handle >> carefully >> > - >> > >> > When there are exceptions caused by one of the document within the batch >> > then the documents after that specific documents doesnt make it to the >> index >> > ie., lets say out of 100 documents trying to get added, doc 56 has an >> issue >> > due to schema restrictions, etc., then docs 57 - 100 dont make it to the >> > index. Even for docs 1 - 55 to get indexed I need the commit outside the >> > exception handling block of the addBeans() method. >> > >> > In the above scenario I would like Solr (or) Solrj to return the doc id's >> > that got indexed successfully or the doc id's that failed. I would also >> like >> > for the documents 57 - 100 to be processed & not get dropped abruptly >> > because doc 56 had an issue. >> > >> > Not sure if there is a way for me to get these details/functionality >> right >> > now. If I cant get them, I can try to take a crack at developing a patch. >> I >> > would require a lot more help in the latter scenario ;-) >> > >> > Thanks in advance. >> > >> > -- karthik >> > >> >
