How is that different from doing a field search and just counting the
results?
If you only want the facet of the searched term (input), then why not just
combine that with the result count and use that?
Facets are more useful when you _don't_ know the distribution of values
across a result set because they weren't included in the search criteria.
Maybe this needs a new name or handler than facet.
What am I missing?
On 06/22/2011 03:44 AM, Bill Bell wrote:
Here is an example using exampledocs and trunk 4.0:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=cat:%22hard%20drive%22&version=2.2&sta
rt=0&rows=10&indent=on&facet=true&facet.field=cat&facet.query={!lucene}cat:
%22hard%20drive%22&facet.mincount=1
Results:
<result name="response" numFound="2" start="0">
Etc....
<lst name="facet_queries">
<int name="{!lucene}cat:"hard drive"">2</int>
</lst>
<lst name="facet_fields">
<lst name="cat">
<int name="electronics">2</int>
<int name="hard drive">2</int>
</lst></lst>
Notice that the facet_queries count "2" is the same as the the numFound=2.
But I have no way to use facet.field to count the matches.
The algorithm -
Loop through multiValued field and match on "hard drive". Ignore other
values in there when setting the facet list....
On 6/22/11 1:19 AM, "Dennis de Boer"<datdeb...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Bill,
yes, you absolutely do make sense. I posted the exact same question to
this
mailing list (subject: faceting on multivalued fields), but got no
response
out of it. A friend of mine is now helping out.
I hope someone on the list can give us some advice. I'll post our findings
to this topic.
Regards,
Dennis
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, Bill Bell<billnb...@gmail.com> wrote:
Doing it with q=specialities:Cardiologist or
q=Cardiologist&defType=dismax&qf=specialties
does not matter, the issue is how I see facets. I want the facets to
only
show the one match,
and not all the multiValued fields in specialties that match...
Example,
Name|specialties
Bell|Cardiologist
Smith|Cardiologist,Family Doctor
Adams,Cardiologist,Family Doctor,Internist
When I facet.field=specialties I get:
Cardiologist: 3
Internist: 1
Family Doctor: 1
I only want it to return:
Cardiologist: 3
Because this matches exactly... Facet on the field that matches and only
return the number for that.
It can get more complicated. Here is another example:
q=cardiology&defType=dismax&qf=specialties
(Cardiology and cardiologist are stems)...
But I don't really know which value in Cardiologist match perfectly.
Again, I only want it to return:
Cardiologist: 3
If I searched on q=internist&defType=dismax&qf=specialties, I want the
result to be:
Internist: 1
Does this all make sense?
On 6/21/11 8:23 PM, "Darren Govoni"<dar...@ontrenet.com> wrote:
So are you saying that for all results for "cardiologist",
you don't want facets not matching "Cardiologist" to be
returned as facets?
what happens when you make q=specialities:Cardiologist?
instead of just q=Cardiologist?
Seems that if you make the query on the field, then all
your results will necessarily qualify and you can discard
any additional facets you don't want (e.g. that don't
match the initial query term).
Maybe you can write what you see now, with what you
want to help clarify.
On 06/21/2011 09:47 PM, Bill Bell wrote:
I have a field: specialties that is multiValued.
It indicates the doctor's specialties: cardiologist, internist, etc.
When someone does a search: "Cardiologist", I use
q=cardiologist&defType=dismax&qf=specialties&facet=true&facet.field=spe
ci
alt
ies
What I want to come out in the facet is the Cardiologist (since it
matches
exactly) and the number that matches: 700.
I don't want to see the other values that are not Cardiologist.
Now I see:
Cardiologist: 700
Internist: 45
Family Doctor: 20
This means that several Cardiologist's are also internists and family
doctors. When it matches exactly, I don't want to see Internists,
Family
Doctors. How do I send a query to Solr with a condition.
Facet.query=specialties:Cardiologist&facet.field=specialties
Then if the query returns something use it, otherwise use the field
one?
Other ideas?
