Solr supports having the browser cache the results. If your client code supports this caching, or your code goes through an HTTP cacher like Squid, it could return a cached page for a query. Is this what you mean?
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Nicholas Chase <nch...@earthlink.net> wrote: > Seems to me what you're asking is how to have an accurate query time when > you're getting a response that's been cached by an HTTP cache. This might > be from the browser, or from a proxy, or from something else, but it's not > from Solr. The reason that the QTime doesn't change is because it's the > entire response -- results, parameters, Qtime, and all -- that's cached. > Solr isn't making a new request; it doesn't even know that a request has > been made. So if you do 6 requests, and the last 5 come from the cache, > Solr has done only one request, with one Qtime. > > So it sounds to me that you are looking for the RESPONSE time, which would > be different from the QTime, and would, I suppose, come from your > application, and not from Solr. > > ---- Nick > > > On 10/4/2011 7:44 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > >> Still doesn't make sense to me. There is no >> Solr HTTP cache that I know of. There is a >> queryResultCache. There is a filterCache. >> There is a documentCache. There's may >> even be custom cache implementations. >> There's a fieldValueCache. There's >> no http cache internal to Solr as far as I >> can tell. >> >> If you're asking if documents returned from >> the queryResultCache have QTimes that >> reflect the actual time spent (near 0), I'm >> pretty sure the answer is "yes". >> >> If this doesn't answer your question, please >> take the time to formulate a complete question. >> It'll get you your answers quicker than multiple >> twitter-style exchanges. >> >> Best >> Erick >> >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Lord Khan Han<khanuniver...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I just want to be sure.. because its solr internal HTTP cache.. not an >>> outside httpcacher >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Erick >>> Erickson<erickerickson@gmail.**com<erickerick...@gmail.com> >>> >wrote: >>> >>> But if the HTTP cache is what's returning the value, >>>> Solr never sees anything at all, right? So Solr >>>> doesn't have a chance to do anything here. >>>> >>>> Best >>>> Erick >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Lord Khan Han<khanuniver...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We are using this Qtime field and publishing in our front web. Even the >>>>> httpCache decreasing the Qtime in reality, its still using the cached >>>>> old >>>>> Qtime value . We can use our internal qtime instead of Solr's but I >>>>> just >>>>> wonder is there any way to say Solr if its coming httpCache >>>>> re-calculate >>>>> the Qtime. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Erick Erickson<erickerickson@gmail.** >>>>> com <erickerick...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Why do you want to? QTime is the time Solr >>>>>> spends searching. The cached value will, >>>>>> indeed, be from the query that filled >>>>>> in the HTTP cache. But what are you doing >>>>>> with that information that you want to "correct" >>>>>> it? >>>>>> >>>>>> That said, I have no clue how you'd attempt to >>>>>> do this. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best >>>>>> Erick >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Lord Khan Han<khanuniver...@gmail.com >>>>>> > >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is there anyway to get correct Qtime when we use http caching ? I >>>>>>> >>>>>> think >>>> >>>>> Solr >>>>>> >>>>>>> caching also the Qtime so giving the the same Qtime in response what >>>>>>> >>>>>> ever >>>> >>>>> takes it to finish .. How I can set Qtime correcly from solr when I >>>>>>> >>>>>> use >>>> >>>>> http caching On. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> -- Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com
