Wow the shameless plugging of product (footer) has hit a new low Otis.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi Yury, > > Not sure if this was already covered in this thread, but with N smaller cores > on a single N-CPU-core box you could run N queries in parallel over smaller > indices, which may be faster than a single query going against a single big > index, depending on how many concurrent query requests the box is handling > (i.e. how busy or idle the CPU cores are). > > Otis > ---- > > Performance Monitoring SaaS for Solr - > http://sematext.com/spm/solr-performance-monitoring/index.html > > > >>________________________________ >> From: Yury Kats <yuryk...@yahoo.com> >>To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >>Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 12:58 PM >>Subject: Core overhead >> >>Does anybody have an idea, or better yet, measured data, >>to see what the overhead of a core is, both in memory and speed? >> >>For example, what would be the difference between having 1 core >>with 100M documents versus having 10 cores with 10M documents? >> >> >>
