>>
OK, first question is why are you searching on two different values?
Is that intentional? 
<<

yes - our users have to be able to locate a part or model number (that may
or may not have periods in that number) even if they do NOT enter the number
with the embedded periods.  

example: 

actual part number in our database is BP2.1UAA

however the user needs to be able to search on BP21UAA and find that part.

there are business reason why a user may see something different in the
field then is actually in the database.

does this make sense?



>>
If I'm reading your problem right, you should
be able to get/not get any response just by toggling whether the
period is in the search URL, right? 
<<

yes - simply put - the user MUST get a hit on the above mentioned part if
they enter BP21UAA or BP2.1UAA.

>>
But assuming that's not the problem, there's something you're
not telling us. In particular, why is this parsing as "MultiPhraseQuer"?
<<

sorry - i did not know i was doing this or how it happened - it was not
intentional and i did not notice this until your posting.  i am not sure of
the implications related to this or what it means to have something as a
MultiPhraseQuery.

>>
Are you putting quotes in somehow, either through the URL or by
something in your solrconfig.xml?
<<

i did not use quotes in the url - i cut and pasted the urls for my tests in
the message thread.  i do not see quotes as part of the url in my previous
post.

what would i be looking for in the solrconfig.xml file that would force the
MultiPhraseQuery?

it seems that this is the crux of the issue - but i am not sure how to
determine what is manifesting the quotes?  as previously stated - the quotes
are not being entered via the url - they are pasted (in this message thread)
exactly as i pulled them from the browser.

thank you,
mark





--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/struggling-with-solr-WordDelimiterFilterFactory-and-periods-or-dots-tp3724822p3730070.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to